Talk:Aaj Ki Raat (Stree 2 song)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Sachin–Jigar's 2024 single "Aaj Ki Raat" from the film Stree 2 peaked at #1 on Billboard India for consecutive thirteen weeks through 18 August 2024 to 16 November 2024?
- ALT1: ... that Sachin–Jigar's 2024 single "Aaj Ki Raat" from the film Stree 2 was shot on Tamannaah Bhatia's birthday in the 5 degree temperature? Source: https://www.aninews.in/news/entertainment/bollywood/its-special-because-i-shot-it-on-my-birthday-tamannaah-bhatia-on-her-song-aaj-ki-raat-from-stree-220240727200804/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Doris Ilda Allen
Created by KunalAggarwal95 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.
KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 16:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC).
The article has been sitting at review for over a month, and I think that is because the article has several problems and nobody wanted to touch it. 1. There are several poorly worded sentences that were obviously written by someone whose first language is not English. (For example, "The song was shot on Bhatia's birthday in the 5 degree temperature.") It needs copyediting for readability. Some of the sentences such as " It was picturised on Tamannaah Bhatia" make no sense and have misspelled words. 2. Much of the article is quoted text. When removing the quotations per WP:DYKCRIT, the prose count is only 1100 characters which is considerably below the minimum of 1500 characters. 3. While the hook fact is reasonably interesting, both hooks read awkwardly and need revision to be usable. Given the amount of time this has been at DYK and the large number of problems, it is time to reject this nomination.4meter4 (talk) 02:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
