Talk:A Very Royal Scandal

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Related shows

@Barry Wom: How they are listed on Amazon is irrelevant. Does this mean that I should just assume that you know better than the actual streaming service and the production company whether these shows are related or not? Keivan.f^Talk 16:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The series is described in the article body (correctly, in my opinion) as a "spiritual successor" to the previous shows. All three share a production company and have similar titles, but have nothing else in common. The "Related" field in the infobox is for "remakes, spin-offs [and] adaptations for different audiences". None of these criteria apply in this case. Barry Wom (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing could be said about seasons 1 and 2 of Feud. Totally unrelated stories, yet part of the same series. There are other examples as well. I don't know why we're making an exception out of this one. Keivan.f^Talk 19:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of the Feud articles use the "Related" field in the infobox. Which is correct, as the second series is neither a spin-off nor a remake nor an adaptation. The fact that the same production company made all three "Scandal" shows is already spelled out in the article bodies. There's no reason to add the information to an unsuitable field in an already overstuffed infobox. Barry Wom (talk) 11:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]