Talk:A Single Blade of Grass

A Single Blade of Grass has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 7, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that one reviewer called "A Single Blade of Grass" "yet another adventure in weird, Native American mysticism from the folks at 1013 Productions"?

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Single Blade of Grass/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 18:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Add production codes and running time.
Run time added, where was it you found production codes though?

Unlink American per WP:OVERLINK.
I left that link as it's to Television in the United States, which you've suggested linking in the past.

premiered should be originally aired.
Left as is; they're just two ways of saying the same thing.

Only Fox should be linked, without network.
Got it.

""A Single Blade of Grass" featured guest appearance" missing something?.
Amended to "appearances".

Add "The show centers on ...", "In this episode".
Done.

Can the guest stars be directly referenced?.
Haven't got a source for it outside the episode itself, but that should suffice (just part of the episode like the title or plot is)

"in its initial broadcast", "in" should be "upon".
Sure.

Link New York per WP:MOS.
Linked on the first mention already.

"1997–1998" remove "19" from the first part of "1998", for WP:YEAR.
Done.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Why do some references have publishers and others don't? Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order. References should be sorted in order; for example, "[3][1][2]" should be sorted in proper order.
All got.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Overall; good work. On hold for now. TBr and ley 04:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm passing to GA now. I got the production codes added. TBr and ley 16:21, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]