Talk:A Million Penguins

This article was nominated for deletion on April 1, 2007. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic literature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature

Plot?

What exactly is the plot of this novel? It should be mentioned in the article. --96.240.61.34 (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not like it matters anymore =(, since the wiki is no longer active. A great idea that suffered from poor execution . . . . --200.59.188.242 (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should still be mentioned, even if the project is inactive. However, the link to the site provided here does not work, and the site itself is probably dead.-Zyrath (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a statement that no cohesive plot or narrative developed. Lijil (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

truuue

truue andrana —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.39.117.158 (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Viewpoint

Under the "reception" heading I added another positive viewpoint referenced in the research report to further enforce a neutral stance in the article. 2601:1C2:4580:FAB0:E953:7EE8:D520:7825 (talk) 02:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]