Talk:A Flintstone Christmas

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Holidays: Christmas Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Untitled

The goofs seem to be more speculation then anything else. Lots42 (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a continuity error of my own. How can the Flintstones, a modern stone age family, celebrate the birth of Christ? That event would not have occurred yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin324la (talk • contribs) 01:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree, but - they also count their years backwards ("We are in the year 1.000.000 b.C." or something like it)! So it wouldn't be a countinuity error to celebrate the FOLLOWING coming of the savior . . . right? :-) And also there is a big mistake in the goofs: there HAD BEEN anyone wearing footwear in Bedrock - the Waitress in the Ending credits of every calssic Flintstones episode!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.166.87.1 (talk) 21:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now referenced, and in two articles. Ribbet32 (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]