Talk:A Certain Magical Index season 1
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move 28 March 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved by VarisKnight. wbm1058 (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- List of A Certain Magical Index episodes (season 1) → A Certain Magical Index (season 1)
- List of A Certain Magical Index II episodes → A Certain Magical Index II (season 2)
- List of A Certain Magical Index III episodes → A Certain Magical Index III (season 3)
– About a week ago or longer, I hadn't gotten to find the time to use this item template. So the above pages/ articles has "list of" and per reasoning to WP:TVSEASON. It does not use this said word set. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Agree with the removal of "list of", but the disambiguation does not work with the title change. "A Certain Magical Index II (season 2)" makes it appear like there is a "A Certain Magical Index II (season 1)" as well. These should either be A Certain Magical Index (season 2) or A Certain Magical Index II. --Gonnym (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oh? I added the roman numeral there? I guess that can be taken out and use the latter recommend name title. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. There seems to be two possibilities here – either: A Certain Magical Index (season 1), A Certain Magical Index (season 2) & A Certain Magical Index (season 3), or A Certain Magical Index I, A Certain Magical Index II & A Certain Magical Index III. But the proposed moves are redundant. Of the two, I suspect the former option is safer, so I support the former, more inline-with-WP:NCTV option. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Too much?
[edit]@Centcom08: I think you put far too much content into this. Look at season articles for series like Bleach (TV series) where most of their "list of episodes" are featured status and they don't do much more than be an episode list. Link20XX (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Actually, I already planned to expand the three seasons with guidance from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television ("The structure of television articles, season/series articles, and episode articles should generally follow the suggested formatting.... The basic order of these pages tends to follow: Lead, plot, cast lists, production, broadcast and home media, and reception, with any other miscellaneous sections coming afterward."). I used "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1)" as a sample since it is a "good article". Centcom08 (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- This article has been assessed as a list class, which makes it ineligible for GA. However, you could go for FL like in Quantico (season 1) for a good TV example or One Piece (season 5) for a good anime example, both of which are featured lists. Link20XX (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
I see. No worries, I will no longer nominate it in GAN but will keep expanding the series' three seasons (I am done with season 1 so two more). Thank you so much for the heads up :) Centcom08 (talk) 00:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
By the way, congratulations on A Certain Magical Index for being a good article-certified :D Centcom08 (talk) 00:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oh you helped too so you should get some credit. On that note, I was planning to nominate it for WP:DYK. Sound good? Link20XX (talk) 01:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
That will be awesome! Let's do that. Centcom08 (talk) 02:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)