Talk:AV-TEST

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

A table of AV-TEST's results

For a sample of AV-TEST's testing results in WP, see here. --Jerome Potts (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really Independent?

Given the fact that the "test results" of AV-TEST can easily be debkuned as biased in favor of Anti Virus software, one must pose the question if they are really independant and not rather a marketing activity of the AV industry in general. For example the regulary award a lot of AV products a protection of 99-100% against "0 day" attacks (e.g. viruses in email attachments) while everyone can test by himself that in reality the protection about 0day email viruses is around 0% for all AV software. Just grab some virus attachments from your daily spam and feed it to different AV software. Most of them will not recognize it during the first 24 hours after you received it. After some days, maybe 30% of the software will detect it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.66.207 (talk) 11:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]