Talk:AUTOSAR
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Implementers table is very bad.
[edit]First of all it is not complete, secondly and worse the table uses abbreviations (BSW, RTE, MCAL) which arent explained anywhere. Wikipedia pages shouldnt use abbreviations without explaining them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:638:A000:4142:0:0:FF10:8F07 (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, marking this as done, verified. Done--𝔏92934923525 (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
COMASSO
[edit]There's a link to the homepage of COMASSO, all upprcase and no direct relevant link.. anybody? Camp0s (talk) 10:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Misc
[edit]News item mentioning AUTOSAR in the "External link column is not the right link. It can be removed.oop;l;ll
- Hi, marking this section/comment as done. I re-organized it. The Misc comment is a joke. Done--𝔏92934923525 (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Automobile articles
- Unknown-importance Automobile articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors