Talk:ATS (programming language)

Talk

Hi there, it appears that ATS often performs better than C in the The Computer Language Benchmarks Game which I think makes it quite notable to my mind. If someone is willing to take some time to help investigate this I think it might be good! Errantkid (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure which article to link to with regard to theorem proving. Automated theorem proving does not look correct to me. Help please? Errantkid (talk) 14:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I put in a link to formal verification but see also interactive theorem proving. ATS really is a pretty interesting development in this area. 207.241.239.70 (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)== Notability ==

Per Google Scholar, the ICFP 05 paper is cited by 70 other papers [1], plus there are dozens of related papers and articles by the same authors and by others. This passes any reasonable Wikipedia notability test for this type of subject in my understanding. 207.241.239.70 (talk) 07:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on ATS (programming language). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/ats.php
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://ats-lang.sourceforge.net/DOCUMENT/INT2PROGINATS/HTML/x2482.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090804092735/http://www.ats-lang.org:80/TUTORIAL/contents/compilation.html to http://www.ats-lang.org/TUTORIAL/contents/compilation.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110904160146/http://www.ats-lang.org/DOCUMENTATION/MISC/manual_main.pdf to http://www.ats-lang.org/DOCUMENTATION/MISC/manual_main.pdf#page=65
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ats-lang.org/htdocs-old/DOCUMENT/MISC/manual_main.pdff#page=61
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100413053430/http://www.ats-lang.org:80/TUTORIAL/contents/dataviews.html to http://www.ats-lang.org/TUTORIAL/contents/dataviews.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100414020420/http://www.ats-lang.org:80/TUTORIAL/contents/datatypes.html to http://www.ats-lang.org/TUTORIAL/contents/datatypes.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140809193400/http://www.ats-lang.org/htdocs-old/DOCUMENT/MISC/manual_main.pdf to http://www.ats-lang.org/htdocs-old/DOCUMENT/MISC/manual_main.pdf#page=64
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140809193101/http://www.ats-lang.org/htdocs-old/TUTORIAL/contents/val-and-var.html to http://www.ats-lang.org/htdocs-old/TUTORIAL/contents/val-and-var.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

.cats file extension

I removed the .cats file extension from the list, since, unlike .sats, .dats, and .hats, .cats is not used for ATS code, but rather for C code that's intended to be used in conjunction with ATS code. It's a bit of a gray area, so if someone better at Wikipedia than me wants to add a footnote/reference that'd be great. --Ebf526 (talk) 11:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

References

Dubious repository metrics in the Future section?

Why is Microsoft’s GitHub code forge mentioned specifically with specific without comparing elsewhere? I am uncomfortable with this as a sole metric of popularity. This seems like more of footnote about popularity most likely being low rather than listing specific numbers. Toastal (talk) 14:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)