Talk:ATSC 3.0

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ATSC 3.0 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Text and/or other creative content from ATSC standards was copied or moved into ATSC 3.0 with this edit on October 11, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

List of stations

Just a quick glance, the list of stations is woefully inaccurate. Someone listed stations based on FCC filings, not realizing that ATSC 1.0 guest host stations for 3.0 *also* have to file for ATSC 3.0 status even though they are continued 1.0. Example is Syracuse NY where WSTM, WTVH and WSYR-TV are all listed as 3.0. However only WTVH is *actually* transmitting with ATSC 3.0, WSTM and WSYR-TV are hosting the 1.0 legacy channels of WTVH. NECRAT^{Plates On} 00:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes split the list into a separate article Theaveng (talk) 15:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Next Gen TV"

If ATSC 3.0 is known as "Next Gen TV" in the marketing and political spheres, then this article needs to be edited to reflect this (as well as the Nextgen (disambiguation) page... AnonMoos (talk) 01:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are you proposing, a page move or simply including content related to "Next Gen TV" within the article? Huggums537 (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel particularly qualified to edit the article, but I created redirects "Next Gen TV" and "Next-Gen TV", and at a minimum, one of those phrases (the more correct one) should be included in boldface near the beginning of this article (since it's a prominent alternative name). AnonMoos (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't feel qualified to make a simple edit such as that? Yet, you know how to create redirects? You are an intriguing person, my friend. ~~Where do these redirects exist? In your sandbox?~~ I found the redirect and added the bolded text to the article. Huggums537 (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No where in industry use is it different than NEXTGEN TV. "Discover the Unlimited Possibilities of NEXTGEN TV". "With NEXTGEN TV, you can immerse yourself in stunning video with brilliant color, sharper images and deeper contrast that’ll make you feel like you’re really there." "NEXTGEN TV provides consistent volume across channels while Voice + dialogue enhancement allows you to hear every voice clearly."

https://www.watchnextgentv.com/

I would like to identify the ATSC 3 hosts possibly by BOLDING and the ATSC 1 hosts possibly by ITALICS

Unreliable source for first live end to end transmission.

I removed this source which makes the claim that the first end to end transmission was made on Feb. 23, 2016. However, the photos taken at the event from this source clearly show the date to be 1.20.2016. Additionally, this source says that LG made the announcement of the test on Feb. 24th. The day LG announced the test is not the same thing as being the day LG completed the test. Huggums537 (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newest Video Codecs

Is there any: VVC = H266 = MPEGi or MPEG-5 Part 2 = LC EVC

or License free: AV1/VP9 or MPEG-5 Part 1 = EVC video codecs inclusion possibility?

Or has it been actually rejected yet?

They are pretty new, They have been just finalized in 2020.

I would like that someone could answer that within article.

or Aren't this: ATSC 3.0 standard video codec independent - agnosticly transparent to video codec used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 07:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split U.S. stations broadcasting in ATSC 3.0

Agree with the proposed split as edited by @ViperSnake151: through this edit. 2603:8001:AF02:CD00:A189:56A1:A235:830D (talk) 16:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of DRM - what a shock

The entire article reads as if it were industry PR. No mention whatsoever of DRM and the controversies around ATSC 3.0 confirms it. This is everything Wikipedia aspires to be: Bland useless articles written from the POV of people with a political or financial stake in the subject matter. 12.203.54.189 (talk) 11:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have well-sourced information about DRM and the controversy in this context, please add it to the article. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas?

If ATSC 3.0 is be broadcast in Las Vegas, NV, it sure doesn't show. Not sure how to add this to the article, as it's not like there's any Wikipedia-type of sources to cite. Just that I do lots of visiting in people's home, and most just use a Roku with Cox Cable or DirecTV/Dish now, or they just watch on their phones. Again, unsure how to smooth this out with citation of sources, and right now, advise to not add it to the article yet. 199.127.116.26 (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]