Talk:AT&T Communications

Telecommunications: Bell System Mid‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Bell System task force.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from AT&T Communications was copied or moved into AT&T Communications Inc.. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

inaugurated?

[1951] "inaugurated the Long Lines network," sounds iffy.

Coast to coast voice existed long before then. L1 was installed in the 1930's. Further, there was K-Carrier back to the late 1920's. 166.84.1.1 (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AT&T Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061113084433/http://www.privateline.com/mt_telephonehistory/iv_the_telephone_evolves/05_part_e/ to http://www.privateline.com/mt_telephonehistory/iv_the_telephone_evolves/05_part_e/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge the two articles to avoid confusion to readers of Wikipeida — BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) ^{(ping back)} 12:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that AT&T Communications (2017) be merged into AT&T Communications as they are the SAME company just from different times. I think the best approach is to Move AT&T Communications (2017) to AT&T Communications and move AT&T Communications to AT&T Communications's history section. — BrandonALF ^(talk) 01:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BBMatBlood: I think that kind of makes sense even though new AT&T Communications is a subsidiary and one of four principal wholly owned subsidiaries (business units). The other three are- WarnerMedia, AT&T International, and AT&T Ads & Analytics.

I think two separate articles causes confusion and agree with the idea to move AT&T Communications into the History section. – Boothit11 (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.