Talk:AKRAK

This redirect falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles

Estonia

AKRAK is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

New pages patrol

I have patrolled this page today as part of the above project. I would suggest the adding of reliable citations and expansion of the article, with the removal of any unverified or unencyclopedic information, as well as the expansion of the article. Regards, HJ Mitchell (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this organization notable?

I found this article while screening the entries at List of UFO organizations for notability. The body of this article consists of a single sentence, there are no in-line citations, the organization itself is apparently inactive, and based upon the available source list it is impossible for me, and I assume >99% of enWiki readers, to judge if this organization is, or ever was, notable in any way. The article has been around since 2009, so there has been plenty of time for interested editors to work on it, yet...there isn't much of anything here. Does anyone have any compelling reason(s) (e.g., reliable sources in English) for why this article should not be subject to PROD or AfD here at enWiki? Thanks in advance for any responses. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! We have an Estonian at hand! It's me! And even better: I'm apparently already familiar with this entire topic ("apparently" because it came as a surprise to me just now). It looks like in 2012 I added that list of sources in the article, all of which are reliable sources, by the way, even if they're not English -- enWiki doesn't discriminate against non-English sources, it just prefers English ones if those are available. Also a notable organization becoming inactive doesn't suddenly turn it unnotable. That being said, apparently I thought in 2012 that "though I think it'd be best to create an article for Igor Volke and redirect this one there". The article exists now and turns out I'm the one who created it in 2015. AKRAK could maybe be merged into the Volke article. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 02:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added the merge tag and notified the Estonia WikiProject. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 02:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds terrific. One sentence does not an article make, of course, so I'm glad there is a solution that keeps AKRAK "alive" but also complements a pre-existing page. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraphine Gryphon and JoJo Anthrax: merge to Igor Volke--Estopedist1 (talk) 11:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 23:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]