Talk:ACAPS
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Better sources are needed for this article!
[edit]This article is extremely under-sourced. The entire (overly long) lede had absolutely NO reference citations at all, until I inserted a minimal descriptive sentence referenced from Reuters.
Most of the rest of this sizeable article appears to be sourced from the organization, itself -- directly or indirectly. That is not consistent with WP:RS and WP:NPOV. The few independent, substantial sources appear to simply acknowledge that ACAPS is a source for an article or report -- without providing much information about the organization. While I presume that this is a reputable organization, presumptions are NOT the basis for a Wikipedia article; RELIABLE SOURCES are! ~ Penlite (talk) 16:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)