Talk:ABC News (Australian TV channel)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ABC News (Australian TV channel) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Television Mid‑importance

	Australia portal ABC News (Australian TV channel) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Media High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Murdoch

Should something be mentioned about Murdoch's opposition to the channel? Reubot (talk) 07:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only two articles I've found so far regarding his opposition are [1] and [2], with both being from Jan/Feb this year. Not exactly relevant in July. Wally Otto (talk) 11:16, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ABC News 24 radio studios

ABC News 24 will also links live to the ABC programs such as AM, PM, The World Today, Radio National and a range of local radio programs as well as Radio National news, Classic FM news, triple j news and Local Radio news. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CTVDigital1 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source? That's the only reason why it isn't being accepted, is because you haven't cited the source.. Wally Otto (talk) 12:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaus

Where do they have beauraus? Do they have one in Delhi?

Bureaux?

Isn't the plural of 'bureau', 'bureaux'? not 'bureaus'? Or is either correct? Either way, one should be decided on as both are used in the article. JWPJ (talk) 06:24, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who's the head?

Who are the C-levels in this outfit? Who runs the station? The article only mentions presenters, but no one in production or management. —Pengo 09:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling & Grammar

Any reason why someone removed the capital letters? Robbo128 10:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

"Live in Eastern States"

The section Repeated from ABC1 is misleading because several shows, most notably Q&A, are shown on ABC News 24 in WA before they are shown on ABC1. Hack (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

The criticism sections seems to be intent on pushing a very particular point of view about the ABC's news coverage, in particular of the Paris hostage situation.

The first citation given for a statement saying that the channel often just shows 'old footage' was actually a reply to previous reporting criticising ABC News 24 for not having shown more of the Christmas Island refugee story, and was knocking Sky News Australia for having devoted three and a half hours to the story when there was little to say. It almost looked like the references were sought out to support the opinions written here, rather than the Wikipedia section having been written as a balanced piece.

Whether or not the ABC's coverage of the Paris terrorist incidents was dangerous to the hostages remains a matter of personal opinion unless a suitably noteworthy source - a source that is actually about that ABC coverage - is found. Was a newspaper article written up on that exact point? If not, it isn't suitable for inclusion here either.

I have removed the elements that are clearly just personal opinion pushing and left the remaining items - which as it turns out, are fairly generic criticisms of rolling news stations.

Mauls (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oxymoron: Live rolling news coverage

Surely the epithet "rolling" adds nothing to "live" in this context? I count four (4) occurrences of "rolling" and eleven (11) of "live". As far as I can tell, "rolling" is journalistic jargon, and I would prefer to use "live" instead, as I believe that by doing so more readers would understand it better. Thoughts? yoyo (talk) 04:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought better of this, and looked it up in the OED! ;-)

News reports that are broadcast 24 hours a day; frequently attributive, especially designating a service, channel, or station devoted to this.

My bad ...! yoyo (talk) 04:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there is a difference in context between "rolling" and "live", whereby rolling is essentially continuous news reports/programming, opposed to live which could be a 30 second update followed by a prerecorded program (which is live but not rolling). You can also have continuous live news reporting, which would be BOTH live and rolling. -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ABC News 24. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427091239/http://www.mediaspy.org/report/2010/07/13/abc-news-24-will-launch-on-thursday-22-july/ to http://www.mediaspy.org/report/2010/07/13/abc-news-24-will-launch-on-thursday-22-july/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ABC News logo 2017.svg

File:ABC News logo 2017.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 05:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]