Talk:ABA Journal

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Retaliation Edits

Unemployed -- it is unethical of you, if you did this knowingly, to accuse me of editing a page that I did not edit. Which is obviously the case here. We assume good faith, but that it is a rebutable presumption. You are actively continuing to rebut it. Please do not, as you did above, spread blatant falsehoods. It is unethical if done knowingly, and negligent in the extreme if done unknowingly. Please edit ethically and with due care. (As to the removal of the ELs, they are in accord with the EL guidelines). Epeefleche (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, as indicated here, there is not -- as you assert -- any such consensus. For you to assert otherwise is again either unethical, or grossly negligent. Since it accompanies the above grave mis-statement, my concern about your editing and your "good faith" increases. Epeefleche (talk) 21:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ABA Journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanet.org/journal/FAQ.HTML
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanet.org/journal/home.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanet.org/journal/jan01/home.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708104100/http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070904/MEDIABUSINESS/70904006/1117/FREE to http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070904/MEDIABUSINESS/70904006/1117/FREE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]