Talk:A9 dualling project/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: JuniperChill (talk · contribs) 16:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, @JuniperChill: I will be reviewing this article for the January 2025 Backlog Drive. This is an ongoing project so I hope that future edits will match the quality of a GA. BigChrisKenney (talk) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Initial Assesment
[edit]Intro
[edit]Added a comma you may wish to review.
History
[edit]Early upgrades
[edit]I removed the conversion template as it was causing 'mile' to change to 'miles' which would have been incorrect.
I made some edits you may wish to review.
Speed cameras
[edit]Good!
Road saftey statistics
[edit]Good!
Construction
[edit]Announcement
[edit]Good!
Completed section (2015-2021)
[edit]Removed the conversion template. I made some edits you may wish to review.
Proposed sections
[edit]I made a few edits you may wish to review.
Tomatin to Moy
[edit]"Some preparation works to this section include trees being cut down and a new railway bridge on the Highland Main Line, which were done in 2021 and 2022, ahead of the main construction work."
- What about the new railway bridge? Was one built? A little clarification here would go a long way, I believe.
"This stretch is expected to start construction by the end of 2024."
- I would consider removal of this sentence as later the paragraph states: 'expected to begin main construction in spring 2025.'
Tay Crossing to Ballinluig
[edit]Good!
Table
[edit]Good!
Delays
[edit]I made some edits you may wish to review. I added a link and removed a duplicate link that you may wish to review.
This first paragraph says the same thing as a previous section Construction -> Proposed sections. I would suggest removing one or the other so that there isn't duplicate information.
Criticism
[edit]I made some edits you may wish to review.
Images
[edit]All images are pertinent and under creative commons.
Sources
[edit]7 is dead, but the archive works.
9 the same.
The rest look good.
Overall, not too much needs to be changed to get this article to GA status, but a little work needs to be done. I will give you time to review and respond to my comments before posting a final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)