Jump to content

Talk:A.I. Revolution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed

[edit]

Infobox says the series started running in March 1997 issue of Princess, yet the volume listing claims the first volume was released in July 1995. Either one of these is very wrong, or some clarification is needed for why the series was serialized years after it started being published in volumes. Also, is this series really still on-going 13 years later?? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 1997 is the wrong date. I can't find any sources saying that Princess magazine started serializing the manga in June 1995. I know it's in Akita Shoten website somewhere, but my Japanese is crap. It's written on the volume list when the Akita Shoten finished publishing the tankobons. Extremepro (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox and prose cover both the serialization and the volumes. So the ending of the serialization is still needed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If I can't find the source for it, do I remove the unsourced material? Extremepro (talk)
For now, no. It needs something there. What does the JA wiki have? (as a side note, when uploading manga covers, try to find good quality images 200-300 pixels wide; Go Comi!'s site had a larger image, so not sure why you choose the tiny one :P I've replaced with a scaled down one from the larger one). -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The tiny image was caused by my default wiki settings of automatically changing my uploaded pictures to 180 px. now I made it 10000 x 10000 px (original picture size)Extremepro (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty. BTW, have you considered making new articles in your sandbox instead of making incomplete stubs like this? It would allow you more to add in whatever information you plan to add before launching it. Either way, when making new manga stubs, please try to include at least a short 1=2 sentence plot summary, as it doesn't really help people unfamiliar with a series to just say something is a manga series published by blah on blah without saying at least a little about what it is about :-P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Extremepro (talk) 04:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review(s)

[edit]

PCS vol. 5PCS archive link vol. 5 used

--KrebMarkt (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on A.I. Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]