Talk:88th Infantry Division (United States)

Military history: North America / United States / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The mystery of the 88th Infantry Division. The best American unit of the Italian front.

Section of a French officer in command of this division that makes for the most effective 7 US divisions deployed in Italy : http://war-and-business.blogspot.fr/2015/01/le-mystere-de-la-88e-division.html L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 08:48, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German view

The 88th was viewed as an "elite stormtrooper" division because they were a very effective unit and the Germans were very wary of them. This, much more than a shoulder sleeve insignia, is why Germans felt the 88th was a "stormtrooper" division. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saturn Five (talk • contribs) 02:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]