Talk:84 Plymouth Grove

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title?

Why is the page title 84 Plymouth Grove, Manchester? No other 84 Plymouth Grove exists, so why is there need to add Manchester to the title, as though to differentiate? 79.78.54.138 (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

I've fixed the latitude and longitude in the infobox: previously they indicated a point in an industrial estate near Clayton-le-Moors. The lat/long as amended are correct when viewing StreetMap or Ordnance Survey Get-a-map; but are too far to the east when viewing Bing Maps UK. I think this is because Bing, as an American organisation, calculate longitudes from the IERS Reference Meridian, which is known to be incorrect (try taking a GPS or similar to the Airy Transit Circle in Greenwich - it won't show 0 degrees longitude). --Redrose64 (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 84 Plymouth Grove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]