Jump to content

Talk:772nd Expeditionary Airlift Squadron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updates since 2001

[edit]

Updates on the post December 2001 unit activities, assignments to higher echelon units and stations and airfields assigned to can be gained by Googling 772d EAS, 772nd EAS and other variations of the number/name. While on some research on a subject related to the unit turned up numerous hits on Google. However, I lack the time right now to do the edit, but thought that should leave a note as to the resource.--TGC55 (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 772d Expeditionary Airlift Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

B class assessment

[edit]

B class. I'm a little puzzled at the citations in the Linage section in this article. In the article 765th Bombardment Squadron the citations were not a problem because in each sub-section there was only one citation and it was on the last bullet point. Clearly, it referred to all the bullet points above it. In the 772d Exp. Airlift Sqdn. article there are several citations at the end, and it's not clear which citation refers to the uncited bullet points above them. I wonder if there is a way to make this clearer. See below. Djmaschek (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • In this example, it is not clear which citation refers to Line 1.
    • Line 1
    • Line 2 (citation 1)
    • Line 3 (citation 2)
  • One possibility: Lineage information is derived from Smith except where otherwise noted. (citation 1)
    • Line 1
    • Line 2 (citation 2)
    • Line 3