Talk:72nd Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 08:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Observations
[edit]- Infobox is not 72nd Street?
- Theoretically it should be "72nd Street" (superscripts are never used in ordinals per MOS:ORDINAL), but as I explained in Talk:86th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)/GA2, there was a consensus to drop the ordinal from infoboxes, which I disagreed with. Epicgenius (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Resolved
- Theoretically it should be "72nd Street" (superscripts are never used in ordinals per MOS:ORDINAL), but as I explained in Talk:86th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line)/GA2, there was a consensus to drop the ordinal from infoboxes, which I disagreed with. Epicgenius (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- The Interborough Rapid Transit Company (IRT) - a good, explanatory link. (I don't live in the US)
- Reference 18 has a good explanation of the H system.
- In addition to $1.5 million (equivalent to $0 million in 2019) How much?
Fixed I didn't realize the rounding was off.
- Reference 19 is a most interesting narrative.
- The Broadway/West Side route became known as the 1, the West Farms route as the 2, and the Lenox Avenue route as the 3.[28] --> is this what was on the rollblinds of the R12's, etc? If so, mention.
- Yes. Epicgenius (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Done
- Yes. Epicgenius (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- During the early 1950s, it was considered to convert the 59th Street–Columbus Circle station --> During the early 1950's, consideration was given to converting the 59th Street ... ...
- could barely fit five- or six-car --> could barely fit five-or-six-car
- Fixed I'm not sure whether the specifically suggested wording works, so I rephrased it differently. The station could fit trains of up to five cars or six cars, but "five-or-six" sounds strange. Epicgenius (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- remove duplication here: (equivalent to $910.3 million in 2019) (equivalent to $910.3 million in 2019) .
- Fixed
- The timing of this appears about face? A 1999 resolution adopts a 1996 design? --> In February 1999, the MTA Board adopted a resolution allowing the MTA to use a request for proposals process for the project.[43] The project's design was completed in 1996 by Dattner Architects and Gruzen Samton
- Fixed
- Page created on 3 June 2005, 306 edits by 86 editors in that time.
- 1313 page views over 90 days.
- Yeah, sadly subway articles don't really have too much viewership. Epicgenius (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Article is basically OK, if we can fix the above, the next stop is GA. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work here, Epicgenius --Whiteguru (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Passed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.