Talk:61st Infantry Division (United Kingdom)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I'll start this one shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- One DAB to be fixed.
- External links OK
- Clarify Carton de Wiart's exact role in Norway better
- I believe I have clarified this now.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's better, but I also made a change regarding the source for his staff. See if it suits you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Looks good to me.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's better, but I also made a change regarding the source for his staff. See if it suits you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- the division would be followed by the Followed by the Fix this
- AddressedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- 5th and 48th (South Midland) divisions and the 71st and 72nd Independent Infantry brigades Capitalize divisions and brigades as they're proper nouns.
- AddressedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Shorten the link for Fullbrook-Leggat to just his first and last names. In general, the naming conventions for people have change with middle names no longer being used. Instead give just first and last names, with occupation, like British Army general, in parentheses as a disambiguator.
- men the Royal Artillery missing "from"
- the Orkney and Shetland missing Islands?
- and it's personal trained two typos
- Fixed 'personnel', what is the other ... I am just not seeing it right now (long day!)EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- The apostrophe in it's. That's used only for the contraction of it is, contrary to the usage with every other word.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, and I have amended that.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- The apostrophe in it's. That's used only for the contraction of it is, contrary to the usage with every other word.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- hyphenate front line
- Be consistent in using title case in your references.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- I think I got them all (apart from the "the"s etc.)EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks once more for another review Sturmvogel. I left a comment above, since I just dont see that typo at the moment! Any other comments welcome, and I will get right on them for you ... well tomorrow!EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)