Talk:60 Hudson Street/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Potentially close paraphrasing, some non-quotations that could be originally phrased aren't
- Fixed.
Images all good, but is the one with 33 Thomas Street in the right part?
- Done.
Infobox satis
Should there not be a bottom nav template?
- Not that I know of. Template:AT&T does not list this, and there is no template for Tribeca yet. epicgenius (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sources and cites all look good
Lead might be a bit long?
- Not really, given the fact that the total length of the rest of the article is 18 kilobytes of prose. But I removed a few sentences. epicgenius (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"muntins" in image caption might need a link? And in body text
Louvers, frieze, etc.
- Done.
Is zColo supposed to be a redlink?
- Removed.

Overall

On hold Some rephrasing probably needed, a few minor things. Kingsif (talk) 23:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kingsif: Thanks. I have done this, including rephrasing. epicgenius (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, very nice. Kingsif (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.