Talk:5th Special Operations Squadron
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 5th Special Operations Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 5th Special Operations Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113212021/http://www.919sow.afrc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=4298 to http://www.919sow.afrc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=4298
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Looking for a reliable source
[edit]I have entered emblem information based on what I find in WP:RS. However, I do not think that information is accurate. While the Air Force Historical Research Agency indicate the current emblem is a modification of the 1966 emblem, I do not believe that is accurate. I believe that the "patch" showing a sword piercing chains is the emblem approved in 1966 (it is certainly the only one used in Viet Nam) is the one approved in 1966, while the current emblem is post-1994, being modified twice first, to remove the arrows and star; and second, to change the motto when the unit stopped flying Combat Shadow C-130s. The return to the squadron motto in Viet Nam (I believe) supports my belief that the 1966 emblem was the sword breaking chains. It would be unusual for a unit to return to a motto that was not official. Bottom line: this is a bleg for a reliable source that supports my opinion on the emblem. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles