Talk:5 World Trade Center
The contents of the Five World Trade Center page were merged into 5 World Trade Center. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 5 World Trade Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
August 2006
[edit]Wasn't there a J. Crew and a Disney Store in the lower levels? Were they still there on September 11th? -- SHODAN 05:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Merge section with World Trade Center Tower 5
[edit]I'd like to ask the editors of this article to help expand the above mentioned article and rephrase the section on the future of tower 5. The new tower will not occupy the same space as 5 WTC and should not be confused with this building. I'll work on it when I finish the other article. JRWalko 02:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like to fashion this article like the article for 7 World Trade Center. | helpdןǝɥ | 00:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Merging Five World Trade Center and 5 World Trade Center sounds like a good idea; Four/4 likewise. Tom Harrison Talk 01:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Strongly Oppose Then One, Two, and Three World Trade Center would have to be merged with the former buildings as well. This isn't a good idea. --Trulystand700 (talk) 23:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with Trulystand700. ReelAngelGirl (Talk) 21:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Strongly Oppose Trulystand700 is right, it shouldn't be merged.Wikih101 (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 5 World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920125754/http://www.asce.org/pdf/5-1-02wtc_testimony.pdf to http://www.asce.org/pdf/5-1-02wtc_testimony.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.amny.com/news/local/am-wtc0622%2C0%2C6464804.story?coll=am-local-headlines
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110328045518/http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/130_liberty_street__77170.aspx to http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/130_liberty_street__77170.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110328045518/http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/130_liberty_street__77170.aspx to http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/130_liberty_street__77170.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222030527/http://www.nypost.com/seven/06222007/news/columnists/what_a_zero__columnists_steve_cuozzo.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/06222007/news/columnists/what_a_zero__columnists_steve_cuozzo.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Split of both original and new buildings
[edit]7 World Trade Center has been split, they've suggesting that Four World Trade Center should be split, what if we do split both the old and new 5 World Trade Center? we used to have an article on that, it has slight information on the old one, If we split them into two, it'd be better as we give more compressive information of both buildings. 120.28.226.197 (talk) 03:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Original building demo
[edit]There needs to be a citation with reliable source(s) as to how 5 (along with 4 & 6) World Trade Center were demolished after September 11th. Who ordered the demolition? Why couldn't they have done repairs instead? How much did the demolition cost and how long did it take? These questions and more are ones that would raise suspicions of conspiracy theorists and need to be answered appropriately. Butterscotch5 (talk) 20:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tell them to take a look at https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch4.pdf It's pretty clear from the photos that there was no way to ever repair those buildings. Dual Freq (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class New York City articles
- Mid-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class September 11, 2001 articles
- High-importance September 11, 2001 articles
- WikiProject September 11, 2001 articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles