Talk:42nd People's Choice Awards

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Edit warring

@CCamp2013 and StealthForce: You are both either at or over the three revert rule. I think it would be better for you both to civily talk this through. I understand the dispute is about the results/listing order? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 08:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samtar:; I'm adding the correct information/winner and @StealthForce: keeps vandalizing the page. Has been doing so for quite a while under different IPs. CCamp2013 (talk) 08:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@CCamp2013: That may well be the case, however StealthForce's edits are not blantant vandalism, therefore you still need to abide by the three revert rule. Please do not make any further reverts until this has been sorted -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 08:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other users have noticed StealthForce doing this as well. and it doesn't need to be sorted out, I provided a source. (source;http://www.peopleschoice.com/pca/awards/nominees/ ) CCamp2013 (talk) 08:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, I meant the edit warring needs sorting - I agree that you are correct as that source proves. Hopefully StealthForce can agree and this can be resolved

-- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 08:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samtar: Im pretty positive no communication will come from StealthForce. I've tried contacting them through their talk page and it gets deleted. CCamp2013 (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well it'd be a shame if it did go that way - even with the edit warring report open there tends to be leniency for people who admit they made a mistake and just move on to other things. Wikipedia is a big place StealthForce, I'd really urge you to constructively discuss this issue here or at the report. Thanks for your civility and calm discussion CCamp2013

-- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 08:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]