Talk:3D cell culturing by magnetic levitation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Monolayer Bashing

The first paragraph of the overview section seems to largely be dedicated to outlining the limitations of monolayer plating, but has little to do with magnetically levitated cell cultures. So I have two issues with it.

1) Is this really relevant for an overview, the first paragraph no less?

2) I feel that while this can be used to make a case for why magnetic culturing is useful, it isn't used fully to do that.

3) The tone itself feels almost condescending towards monolayer plates, I think it could be rewritten

I think a section on the differences or pros and cons between monolayer cultures and levitated cultures could be beneficial, and something like this paragraph could fit there. However, as it currently stands, I feel that this section should not be included or at least needs to be rewritten. Cosmic Nudibranch (talk) 22:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Cosmic Nudibranch's observations but still tried to fix the first sentence to increase the clarity. EmergentRandomness (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the paragraph which was highlighting the controversies surrounding monolayer culture - this is a topic for a different article perhaps. I also edited for NPOV but the whole page just feels like a transcribed journal article or grant proposal, needs further editing. Chromaphile (talk) 10:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any particularly problematic sections? I would like to know which to prioritize as I edit the article. HC226 (talk) 22:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]