Talk:2 Park Avenue

2 Park Avenue has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 2, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 2 Park Avenue appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the colored facade panels of 2 Park Avenue (pictured) were inspired by the texture of fabric?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2 Park Avenue.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

2 Park Avenue

... that the colored facade panels on 2 Park Avenue (pictured) were inspired by the texture of fabric? Source: Robins, Anthony W. (2017). New York Art Deco: A Guide to Gotham's Jazz Age Architecture. Excelsior Editions. State University of New York Press. p. 52.
- ALT1: ... that 2 Park Avenue (pictured) was described as containing one of the "most striking Art Deco facades" in New York City? Source: Robins, Anthony W. (2017). New York Art Deco: A Guide to Gotham's Jazz Age Architecture. Excelsior Editions. State University of New York Press. pp. 52-53.
- ALT2: ... that after the owner of 2 Park Avenue (pictured) was accused of mismanagement, its receiver was paid millions of dollars without providing documentation? Source: Levitt, Leonard (January 22, 1990). "$7M Award to Receiver Raises Some Eyebrows". Newsday. pp. 4, 25
- ALT3: ... that a receiver for 2 Park Avenue (pictured) was paid $5 million, about 40 times higher than the next-largest payment for a receivership proceeding in New York? Source: Levitt, Leonard (January 22, 1990). "$7M Award to Receiver Raises Some Eyebrows". Newsday. pp. 4, 25
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Armadillo shoe

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 12:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

New enough and large enough expansion. QPQ present. All hooks check out, including to Google Books previews, but ALT0/ALT1 are better than ALT2/3. Image is freely licensed (GFDL). No textual issues. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2 Park Avenue/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 19:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images are appropriately tagged; sources are reliable.

Is the earlier Park Avenue Hotel worth a redlink?
Do we know why sources disagree on the number of stories? Seems a very basic fact to get right.
"The building's height was dictated by potential profits, since elevators and other service areas took up a significant part of the rentable area on upper stories." I don't follow this; can you explain?
"The easternmost seven bays are divided into two outer bays and five central bays, similar to design as the facade on Park Avenue), while the westernmost three bays are again different in design": stray parenthesis.
"The spandrels alternatively contain narrow brick headers": I think you mean "alternately"?
In the "Interior" section we jump to past tense, because the renovations mean some of what's described is no longer there. Suggest implying this for the reader by adding "originally" before the first use of past tense: "The lobby's design originally largely consisted...". Actually the first past tense is the subway entrance in the basement, but we don't explicitly say that no longer exists.
"Breitbart also refused to recognize their ownership stakes": What does it mean to recognize an ownership stake?
The "thousands of dollars of damage" caused by the food trucks is cited to sources both of which only say the building manager claimed this, not that it was true.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Regarding the number of stories, there is a mechanical penthouse above the 28th story, which may or may not be classified as its own story. Usually, mechanical penthouses aren't counted, but some sources may count all stories between ground level and the highest roof, regardless of whether the upper stories are actually habitable.

I have fixed the remaining issues now. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes look good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]