Talk:2 Broadway/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

• Short description goes at the top of the article.
• Add alt text to every image being used.
• "named as" - reword or simply remove "as".
• "the 1​, R​ and ​W trains" - add a serial comma.
• Remove the comma after "entrance on Broad Street".
• "The work were" → "The works were" or "The work was"
• Remove the comma after "thirty stories".
• "during 1999" → "in 1999"
• "to high demand" → "to a high demand"
• Wiklink The New York Times.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks, I've done these. Epicgenius (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)