Jump to content

Talk:2K22 Tunguska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pantsir

[edit]

--.:Ajvol:. 00:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Does Pantsyr use the same missile system as Tunguska or is it different? Is there a name for the Tunguska missile system, or is there only a name for the whole vehicle? (including cannons, etc.) I'm curious if Pantsyr has an NATO designation. Thanks, Nvinen 05:02, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, they're both gun/missile systems with radars, with similar roles, but they appear to be different. Perhaps I need to write an article on the Pantsyr. I wonder why it has no SA- name, maybe because it's too new (post cold-war)? I guess I should do more research. Nvinen 05:10, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)


See developer's site:

--.:Ajvol:. 08:47, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

SA-19 designation for the Tunguska incorrect?

[edit]

SA-19 is actually the name of the missile, not the Tunguska gun-missile system.

Is there a reference for this? Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tunguska-M1

[edit]

Ok i made this page it aint all that good so i am hopeing someone will improve it ;) I will try to improve it over time but the more people that help the better

And watch the video with the cheesy mission imposible music :D


Also there are many more items to be found here which could be added to Wiki

http://www.roe.ru/p_prod/airdef.htm

Deng 2005-12-20 15.30 CET


Was also going to move it to tunguska-m1 but am to lazy, so nice of you to move it ;)

Deng 2005-12-22 04.30 CET


I dont think it should be merged the tunguska-m1 is a vehicle in its own right a deserves its own article.

Deng 07-02-06 07.40 CET


i am not a registered user. dont remember my number, my name is John ,from Greece

PANTSIR and TUNGUSKA are two different systems for Russia. for the NATO is one system. the correct is the first. Russian army adopt the TUNGUSKA . the PANTSIR made most for export sales. but recently Russian army decide to adopt it, to help the export sales that were with no succecs. only U.A.E get 50 PANTSIR . a deal for a Russian debt to that country. recently Jordan and Syria express interest to buy the system . Jordan is now evaluating the system. also interest expressed from a South american country. for WIKIPEDIA readers the right is that two different articles must be create. the systems are different
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2K22 Tunguska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GRAU index

[edit]

I have seen GRAU-designations 2K22 (air defence system), 9K22 (missile system) as well as 2S6 (self propelled artillery) for the Tunguska. Which one is correct or do they refers to different parts or versions? /Esquilo (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name variations

[edit]

What is the official name for the Tunguska 2k22, zprk, 2s6, or some other name 69.139.1.18 (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@69.139.1.18 It seems like the name variations are different official names 69.139.1.18 (talk) 23:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]