Talk:21st Fighter Squadron
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 21st Fighter Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 21st Fighter Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140325154910/https://www.luke.af.mil:80/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5003 to http://www.luke.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5003
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Joint or no?
[edit]@Garuda28: seems we have a question that needs to be dug into. One thing is clear though, the fighters are Taiwan owned [1]. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- After doing some digging it appears that the ROKAF still owns the aircraft (https://govtribe.com/opportunity/federal-contract-opportunity/f-16-aircraft-maintenance-fa300214rtaiwan/amp), however the 21st Fighter Squadron is an entirely U.S. owned unit and isn't combined, unlike the North American Aerospace Defense Command or the Combined Space Operations Center. To change that, we'd need a source saying that its a combined unit, rather than a U.S. owned and controlled unit providing a service to the ROKAF. It's like how the 80th Flying Training Wing runs the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program, but is an entirely U.S. unit, rather than being a NATO or combined unit, but rather providing a service for them. Garuda28 (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Arizona articles
- Low-importance Arizona articles
- WikiProject Arizona articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Low-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles