Talk:2090s/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
2097
You will be alive by 2091. Again. And the decade is actually 2091 - 2100. I don't know what else is gonna happen by 2090, but I do know people won't be asking those stupid questions.--Fluence (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
How in the hell could we know whats gonna happen in 2090?MikeyOHoolihan 02:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah Dudtz 1/28/07 10:43 PM EST
All these pages should be removed.. noting down anniversaries 90 years in advance is a bit premature. I'll just get my diary out Whilding87 20:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Why oh why?
"August 24, 2095: Windows 95 celebrates its 100th Aniversary."
...I somehow can't imagine a big parade happening when this day occurs.
Tommyhaych 11:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
"The world ends?"
Cite a source for this "prediction," please. The Magistratus 18:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I deleted these predictions because I felt they were unneeded and largely speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.201.20.184 (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
?
"This article or section contains information about scheduled or expected future events. It may contain tentative information; the content may change as the event approaches and more information becomes available."
Nothing on this page would change, lest the world ends, some major bookburning action takes place or the whole world starts using stardates... 83.226.97.47 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 16:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
this page is so stupid
It is filled almost entirely with FICTIONAL EVENTS, from FICTIONAL SERIES. Isn't this supposed to be an ENCYCLOPEDIA? 99.231.211.103 (talk) 22:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Good solution?
Fictional events in the 2090s. Good solution for all the bullcrap that was here? --Looskuh (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Not really; I reverted. Please get consenus first. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)