Jump to content

Talk:2028 United States presidential election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protected edit request on 10 August 2024

[edit]

Please tag this redirect with {{R with possibilities}}. GTrang (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done If there were possibilities at this point then it wouldn't be salted. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request to complete RfD nomination

[edit]

2028 United States presidential election has been listed at Redirects for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:

{{subst:rfd|content=

to the top of the page and }} to the bottom to complete the nomination. Thank you. GTrang (talk) 03:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

[edit]

RfD closed as refine to United States presidential election#Comparison with other U.S. general elections. C F A 💬 20:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on R with possibilities tagging

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Boldly closing a poorly-formed RfC with minimal WP:RFCBEFORE. (non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should the redirect 2028 United States presidential election be tagged with {{R with possibilities}} or not? That template automatically detects whether a draft exists, and indeed there is one at Draft:2028 United States presidential election. So, that would be a reason in favor of adding the template.

But the " Not done" comment at #Protected edit request on 10 August 2024 above says If there were possibilities at this point then it wouldn't be salted., which I guess is a reason against adding the template.

So, which reasoning is correct, then, for this apparently controversial change that now needs an RfC?

GTrang (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it a change that now needs an RfC? Other than the denied request ten days ago, where has this been discussed? Have you, for example, contacted Pppery (talk · contribs) directly, and reached deadlock? Have you raised a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States presidential elections or the talk pages of any of the other five or six WikiProjects that might be interested? Please see WP:RFCBEFORE: RfC is a process of last resort, not a second step after the first request was refused. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.