Jump to content

Talk:2024 Supercoppa Italiana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name change

[edit]

The page being called 2024 Supercoppa Italiana is inappropriate and inaccurate and should be changed to 2024-25 Supercoppa Italiana. My rationale is that firstly, all the matches are held in 2025. Secondly and more importantly, the signage on the advertisement boards at the stadiums in Riyadh clearly labels it as 2025 Riyadh. Lastly, and most importantly, Lega Serie A which oversees and runs the competition brands it as 2024/25, which you can see here EA SPORTS FC SUPERCUP 2024/25. Plus, other creditable websites call it the 2024-2025 or 2024/25 Supercoppa. Rupert1904 (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are more articles and posts from creditable websites including broadcasters and the clubs themselves to prove that this should be 2024–25:

Rupert1904 (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should not be 2024-25 at all. @Rupert1904: please restore everything. Also the previous edition was related to 2022-2023, but actually no move was made. There is no actual consensus to have the page moved. All this is reminding me of the Supercopa de España, which at the beginning had two years reported, then moved to one year displayed. I ping also @Snowflake91:. Island92 (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teams that have won this competition are reported with the double year also when the super cup was played with two-teams format. Island92 (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That links calls the Supercoppa from last season as 2023-24. Rupert1904 (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which is properly titled as 2025 Supercopa de Espana. Referring to this season's edition as the 2024 Supercoppa Italiana is totally incorrect. Rupert1904 (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources you posted are kinda inconsistent and are also naming it simply "2024 Supercoppa Italiana" in other articles, for example One Football or Inter official website. The article on AC Milan also says "Juventus-Milan: partita Supercoppa Italiana 2024", but I cannot post a direct link for some reason. And we need secondary sources anyway, not Inter or Milan websites. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You read 2024-25 just because the tournament is played "during the 2024-25 season", but the supercup itselfs is related to 2024, as was the case until it was decided to have it played with four teams involved. Island92 (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure it is related to the 2023-24 season in that clubs qualify for this based on how they did in the Serie A and Coppa Italia during the 2023-24 season but it's held during the 2024-25 season, and more specifically in January 2025, and the organizers of the tournament (Lega Serie A) brand it officially as Supercoppa Italiana 2024/2025. 2024 Supercoppa Italiana is inaccurate for so many different reasons and just because another article in the past wasn't moved, doesn't mean this shouldn't. I am going by the official communication from the organizers of the tournament who call it 2024/2025 NOT 2024. 2025 even makes more sense than 2024 as Mediaset (the official TV broadcaster in the home country of Italy) label it on their website as Supercoppa Italiana 2025: Supercup. According to the Mediaset website, the 2024 Supercoppa happened last season. As for secondary sources, I linked to Sky Sports and One Football above. Rupert1904 (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Inter link you posted has a picture of the players celebrating last season's Supercoppa win with the words SUPERCUP RIYADH 2024 in the background. Clearly this season's edition cannot also be the 2024 Supercoppa. Rupert1904 (talk) 20:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I explain. Template:Supercoppa Italiana and Template:Supercopa de España. These two templates are similar. In 2019 the Supercopa de España was jumped, and returned with the 2020 edition under new four-teams format. Hence the template is correct. The Supercoppa Italiana has never jumped since 1988 and if you move the 2023 edition to 2024 or 2023-2024, and the 2024 edition to 2025 or 2024-2025 it doesn't make sense. For example, Lega Serie A called the 2022 edition as 2022-2023 (the last played with two teams) because, as always, "played in the 2022-2023 season". The page we have is simply 2022 Supercoppa Italiana, not 2022-2023, and the match was played in January 2023. Island92 (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Then those pages should also be moved. It is factually incorrect and going against Lega Serie A to call this the 2024 Supercoppa Italiana. AC Milan just posted on their official instagram account celebrating the win calling it 2025 and highlighting their past super cup wins. You can see that here: History. Glory. Milan. We strive to have sourced accurate information on Wikipedia as a public encyclopedia and I am showing you that the organizers of the tournament, credible secondary sources, and the clubs themselves call this the 2024-25 edition and the 2025 title and you don't want to change the name of this article just because the other recent editions of the tournament are also inaccurately titled on wikipedia? It's ridiculous. This is not the 2024 Supercoppa Italiana and should not be called that. As I've indicated above, using the links you shared I might add, Inter Milan won the 2024 trophy last season. Rupert1904 (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because there is no consensus to make such changes just yet. Island92 (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edition was the 37th of the tournament, played in the 2024-2025 season, and the final in 2025. You should not go against the practice if the 2022 edition, called by Lega Serie A 2022-2023, was played in 2023. Island92 (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument is since the other recent Supercoppa Italiana pages are incorrectly named, this one should be incorrectly named too. If the Lega Serie A called it 2022-23, then that is what we should call that edition too. Your argument goes against the encyclopedic nature of wikipedia, what the Lega Serie A calls this edition of the tournament, and what reliable sources refer to it as. Rupert1904 (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then what about the 2020 edition played in January 2021 but despite that called by Lega 2020 and not 2020-2021 or just 2021 because the match played on 2021 date (hence winners could have claimed 2021 winners). This is inconsistency between editions by Lega themselves. Island92 (talk) 23:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If Lega Serie A called the edition played in January 2021 as 2020 and the winners as the 2020 winners then it should remain 2020. That has no bearing on this edition. It's not like I'm not asking you to change the 2015 Supercoppa Italiana held in August 2015 to 2015-16 Supercoppa Italiana. It's not inconsistent from Lega Serie A, they've just changed what they have called the tournament as it's evolved from historically a two team super cup to start the season in August into a four team tournament in January over the last few seasons. The official communication from the league is that this is the 2024-25 edition and that AC Milan are the 2025 winners. Meanwhile, last season was the 2023-24 edition and Inter were the 2024 winners. Putting Milan as winners in 2024 on the AC Milan article or on their player articles is categorically wrong and goes against what the Lega Serie A is telling us this edition was. This is not the 2024 Supercup which Lega Serie A has made very clear by all of their communication. Rupert1904 (talk) 08:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And here are more links following Milan's win last night from the organizers and the winners, all calling it the 2025 title:
Rupert1904 (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And what about of a tournament held in August in the future (four teams involved) and final in August. Will you call it with the double year? It's incosistency. Island92 (talk) 09:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We’re not dealing with possible, theoretical what ifs in the future. That’s not the point of Wikipedia. We can play the what if game all day but that’s not productive and not how to properly edit and improve Wikipedia articles. We deal with facts and credible sources and the fact is this is not the 2024 supercoppa. You are being stubborn and ignoring the fact that the league calls this the 2024-25 edition and that Milan are the 2025 winners. I’m going by official communication from the league who organize the competition. I’m not going by my personal opinion on what I think looks or sounds better. Rupert1904 (talk) 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, the point is that there should not be incosistency between editions despite how Lega Serie A call each. It is not up to be stubborn or not. All winners are indicated with the double year, also when the competition had one year in the name and played within the year. Island92 (talk) 12:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is stubborn and it is incorrect and not backed by credible sources. The format of the competition changed and it’s now a four team tournament held in the following calendar year and Lega Serie A calls it 2024-25 in all of their official communication and branding. Things change and evolve all the time. Leagues and cups move from being in a calendar year to an autumn-spring season and vice versa and correspondingly, we edit Wikipedia to reflect that. For example, it happened in Serie A/Italian championship moving from a calendar season to an autumn-spring schedule after 1909, the German champions pre-Bundesliga era were within a calendar year but since the advent of the Bundesliga in 1963, it’s been autumn to spring. The Svenska Cupen changed from calendar year to autumn-spring following the 2011 season. This happened with the Russian Premier League after the 2010 season as well. There are so many other examples in football where the format of the competition has changed and then we accurately name new editions of the competition to reflect this change. This article should not be titled 2024 just because you find naming it otherwise would be inconsistent. This should be moved to 2024-25 based on the fact that organizers call it 2024-25 in every announcement, article, and video and that Milan announced themselves as the 2025 winner not 2024 winner. Rupert1904 (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is original research. You don't know if in the future the tournament with this new format can be held within the year anyway. How will Lega Serie A call it then? Single year in the title or double year? The tournament has the right to be held other than current January window per other competitions schedules. There is no consensus to make changes. I brought this talk to the Wiki Project Football to make other users aware of it. Island92 (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, we don't deal with future theoretical possibilities. We deal with facts and sources. Rupert1904 (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, some sources claim a thing, other another thing. Island92 (talk) 14:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not true. The one source you've provided (which again is the Lega Serie A website) has Milan as the 2024-25 winners and Inter as the 2023-24 winners. Rupert1904 (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Snowflake91: what do you think about all this? This talk has gone on too much in my opinion. Island92 (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, the sources are inconsistent as I posted above so both versions are technically correct, but I would prefer the current version (just 2024 and not 2024–25) solely for consistency with the previous editions. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully, you are both missing the point. It's not about our personal preferences or opinions about what we think sounds or looks better or if it's consistent, it's about the facts. The format of the tournament has changed thus we change the new articles accordingly. 2024 is not correct whatsoever and there is no consensus to keep 2024. That name has been wrong since the article was created. The organizers of the competition call this edition 2024-25 and call Milan the 2024-25 winners. Milan call themselves the 2024-25 winners. That is fact and has been incredibly consistent throughout and we should follow the lead of Lega Serie A. Consistency has no bearing on this as the competition has changed format. Again, I have linked to many other examples where this has happened in football leagues and cups, both on this talk page and in WikiProject talk. Also, the two sources you shared earlier are older articles and both One Football and Inter Milan corrected that mistake in more recent articles, which I have linked to previously. Please see the latest at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Supercoppa_italiana. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 January 2025

[edit]

– To formalise the discussion above, which is just turning into an edit / move war. WP:OFFICIALNAME (which is not necessarily the WP:COMMONNAME) for the tournament includes the multi-year. Spike 'em (talk) 19:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I am currently neutral to this proposal, but rather than exhort against move wars, I've taken the shortcut of starting the RM for the disputing editors. Spike 'em (talk) 19:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment My opinion already given above. Despite multiple sources claiming the multi-year (by Lega Serie A the organizers first and foremost), the tournament assumes this name as held during the "2024-2025 season". All winners are indicated with the double year, also when the competition had one year in the name and played within the year. Examples. The 2020 edition was held on 20 January 2021, Lega Serie A did not call it 2020-2021 Supercoppa Italiana. Source. The 2021 edition was held on 12 January 2022 and Lega Serie A did call it 2021-2022 Supercoppa Italiana. Source. Since this last edition Lega Serie A has assumed the multi-year name in the Supercoppa Italian title. Hence I see incosistency by Lega Serie A themselves. Here on Wikipedia I'd rather see it more correct to display one year in the name, as has been the case since the first edition in 1988.--Island92 (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rupert1904 (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Primary sources from Inter / Milan websites, especially things like printing on AC Milan shirts from their own shop, are completely irrelevant for article title. Almost all those listed sources are primary, and the ones that are not (like AlArabiya or Footballinsides (which is a blog anyway, and not reliable)) are actually calling it "2025 Supercoppa Italiana", not "2024–25 Supercoppa Italiana", so it needs to be moved to 2025 Supercoppa Italiana if anything. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move & Comment I think there are sufficient official sources from the League itself as to the correct name of the competition, how far back such changes should go is open to debate but there's certainly official content there to suggest the opening sentence should reflect its official name in addition to its sponsored version in all cases where applicable. 18-19, 19-20, 19-20, 20-21,21-22, 22-2323-2424-25. The significant weight of sources calling it either 2024-25 and/or 2025 makes 2024 the least compatible name. However we should be clear that competitions or finals being called specific year may be done so for marketing reasons, so there is no harm in the first sentence using both 24-25 and 2025 i.e. the "Supercoppa Italiana 2024/25, branded as the EA Sports FC Supercup 2025" and a redirect from EA Sports Supercup 2025 (and similar) is probably in order. Koncorde (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]