Talk:2024 Six Nations Championship

Rugby union Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Too much scrolling required to find individual match results

I find that the main inconvenience of the current year's page (2023 and previous years) is the amount of scrolling required just to see individual match results. You have to scroll through the equivalent of about ten pages just to find out who won each match. It would be particularly useful during the tournament to see a one-line score summary of each match near the top of the article. I propose that for 2024 the current fixtures subsection remain exactly as it is, as the first section after the lede, being updated only with the score and link to 'Match details'. This link would go to a Results section lower down the article, after the table, the particpants details etc, where all the match details, currently equivalent to about an A4 page each, are given. Strayan (talk) 02:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I included a table with all the matches played and also upcoming ones. Have a look and let me know. 194.230.147.74 (talk) 18:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The page is not well done. Reason for this: the details of each match - names of players etc. - should be in separate articles as is done in WC Football, for example. (Or even a link to an external source). This page should not go into such detail and should, instead, just list fixtures, venues, dates and scores and so on. Again, as is done with WC Football. 92.184.98.234 (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been remedied. There is no need to split off any of the info into separate pages. The reason we do it for the World Cup is because that competition happens every four years and has a total of 64 matches (increasing to over 100 for the 2026 tournament). – Pee Jay 14:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add a section for the Netflix documentary?

I’ve seen a good few media coverage on the documentary. The Optimistic One (talk) 00:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The documentary covered the 2023 tournament, so any mentions should go there. – Pee Jay 19:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alec Hepburn

The notes on the Wales - Scotland game says that Alec Hepburn made his international debut in the game. It's not strictly true - he made his Scotland debut in this match, but has already played international rugby for England - should the note not reflect this? Bcp67 (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colours in tables

We can use this to discuss. There is no good reason to add colours. And the downside is that they are distracting. CUA 27 (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The colours are actually quite useful in indicating the winners of each game at a glance, rather than having to work out which score was higher. Not sure how distracting they really are. – Pee Jay 18:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without any view on whether the colours should be used or not, if they are used they need to comply with MOS:COLOUR. Bcp67 (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lads. let's get real here. Is a table useful to quickly see what happened in the tournament so far and to also see what's going to happen? It clearly is. Will additional colours help even better to see home and away game victories and losses within seconds? They undoubtedly will. Maybe it's easy enough in the Six nations with only six teams without the colours. But imagine the sheer chaos of removing the colours in the match tables of the URC or the MLR. So why removing them here? It defeats the sole purpose of the table. So either we put the colours back in and somehow manage to add a legend in the existing table, or we put it back down where it was last week where everything was in compliance with the holy scripture of our forefathers. Suggestions? 84.227.28.77 (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Um, what? – Pee Jay 14:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the colours do comply with that MOS. The issue at the moment is that whereas the colour legend would normally appear if the results table were included separately, it's not appearing when incorporated into the standings table. I've raised something at the template talk page, but who knows if it'll ever be seen. – Pee Jay 14:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For interest's sake, the colour scheme was already extensively used elsewhere on other wikipedia projects. For example 194.75.96.194 (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]