Jump to content

Talk:2024 NCAA Division I women's basketball championship game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 17:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the final of the 2024 NCAA Division I women's basketball tournament was the most-watched women's basketball game of all time in the United States? Source: From Hollywood Reporter: "Some 18.87 million people watched South Carolina cap an undefeated season by beating Iowa, 87-75, in Sunday’s championship game, according to final same-day Nielsen ratings (that’s an uptick from 18.7 million in preliminary results). The audience is the largest ever for a women’s basketball game in the United States — and among the biggest for any women’s team sporting event."
    • ALT1: ... that the final of the 2024 NCAA Division I women's basketball tournament became the third consecutive match to break the audience record for a U.S. women's basketball game in a single week? Source: From Hollywood Reporter: "Sunday’s broadcast on ABC and ESPN is the third record-setter for women’s basketball in the past week: The Elite Eight matchup between Iowa and LSU (a rematch of last year’s final) drew 12.3 million viewers on April 1, and the Hawkeyes’ Final Four win over Connecticut Friday surpassed that with 14.4 million people watching."
    • ALT2: ... that the final of the 2024 NCAA Division I women's basketball tournament was the overall most-watched basketball game ever broadcast on ESPN since 2019? Source: From Reuters: "It peaked at 24 million viewers on ABC and ESPN, the sports broadcaster said, and was the most-watched basketball game across men's, women's, college or professional sport since 2019."
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Saturn (SZA song)
    • Comment: I decided to write a few hooks for a very notable sporting event that has recently took place; by the way, props to everyone who helped create and expand the draft article before its shift to the mainspace! I hope I've done a good job, and that my QPQ submission is appropriate...
Moved to mainspace by Queen of Hearts (talk) and Abhiramakella (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Oltrepier (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2024 NCAA Division I women's basketball championship game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 15:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm GhostRiver. I'll be reviewing this article against the good article criteria. By doing so, I am earning points for the WikiCup and the January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive. Although a quid pro quo review is not necessary, it is appreciated. You can see what open good article nominations I have here.

I will go through the article section by section checking it against the criteria. Once I have finished my review, I will place the article on hold, giving you seven days to respond. If you need more time, just reach out! While I'll always put the article on hold once it's ready for you to look at, you may start making changes before I complete my review. — GhostRiver 21:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver Thank you for the detailed review! Everything has been fixed or responded to. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, passing now. Regarding writing out numerals, I will say that having numbers for double-digits is easier on my dyslexia, so I would recommend doing so in the future, but you're right—not strictly MOS. — GhostRiver 21:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]
  • Citation [2] not needed here, as that's all described in the article body
  • Iowa's Caitlin Clark became the first player to score 30 points or more in two championship games. Can't find this linked in the article body.

Participants

[edit]

Iowa Hawkeyes

[edit]

South Carolina Gamecocks

[edit]

Starting lineups

[edit]

Game summary

[edit]

Media coverage

[edit]

Aftermath

[edit]
[edit]

General comments

[edit]
  • No stability concerns, nominator is significant contributor
  • Images are properly licensed and directly relevant to the article
  • Copyvio score looks good
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.