This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
Just came across this on Twitter. To all those watching this page, keep an eye on new wikilinks being added to non-notable TDP candidate names, in case UPEs start creating pages for them. Consensus says that candidates for election do not, per se, meet notability unless they actually win. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 14:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Maphumor do you care to reply here? This is your nth number of time placing the content again even after a notice on your talk page and the article talk page here. 456legendtalk21:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Maphumor, you have crossed your limit of 3 reverts I suppose and I am not going to revert this again. Your inability to respond to the notice on your talk page and here on this talk page is not welcoming for a good consensus on Wikipedia. Instead now, I will be reporting this to the Wikipedia administrator incidents board. Thank you 456legendtalk17:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Dhruv edits, I don't think adding un-notable parties in a large scale to the parties and alliances section is justified. Additionally, the content is not reliable and lack of sources to support the notability of the parties is just making the article a mess with blank columns. Please consider reverting based on the guidelines of the relevant WP.456legendtalk23:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Add vote share and percentages for every one of the Lok Sabha constituencies on their respective Wikipedia pages, the data Is already on this page so it should be on the individual pages as well FreakyMonarch (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Voting percentages of TDP,Jana Sena and BJP are totally wrong.
TDP is 45.8%, Janasena 6.7% and BJP is 2.8% a total of 56%+ for coialation. Should be changed and adjusted Sahantamah (talk) 01:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]