Talk:2024 Indian Premier League/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 11:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 09:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Expect initial remarks in 24-48 hours. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Before I start reviewing, I see that you are only the 7th biggest contributor, with less than 10% authorship, and nothing on the article talk page about you nom-ing it, which isn't good. Remember for next time you are nom-ing something for GA.
Statistics and Awards
[edit]- All good (though can make the Most Boundaries heading only have line- Total Sixes- 2174, instead of newline, and similiar for fours)(not necessary for GA, will just make it look better)
- @DoctorWhoFan91: How about the format used on this page? Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Umm, no. Shudders. Even leaving it as is would be better than this format. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have made a minor change to those tables now. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Playoffs
[edit]- Add sources for the "qualified for the final for the nth time"? (I'll have to check though if the statement might not be WP:OR) Done
Lead
[edit]- Add '.' between "League" and "The tournament" Done
- Mention that Chennai is starting and ending venue bcs they won last year
- Done
Background
[edit]- Clarify that 2008 was also the first edition Done
- Format- CE first sentence, weirdly worded, and explain how the "change in group order was done"- randomly, or by some rule? Done
- mention the playoff is a type of Page playoff system Done
- Schedule- Mention the election and the possibility of being held abroad, before the confirmation it'll be held at home Done
- Mention due to being last year's winners for Chennai again Done
- Expand marketing. Done
- Expand broadcasting Done
- All done, except Marketing & Broadcasting - because, they have literally nothing else to be expanded with... Which is why instead of their own separate section, they are kept as sub-sections. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Broadcasting- mention that's it's second year of the deal of this many $, after viewership etc levels last year? And for Marketing- other brands must have advertised too, and even the sponsors would have put out advertisements? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there aren't enough WP:RS covering those, I will add what I can find. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @DoctorWhoFan91 I have added, what I could find with sources. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Will check, bit busy. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @DoctorWhoFan91 I have added, what I could find with sources. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there aren't enough WP:RS covering those, I will add what I can find. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Teams
[edit]- Add comma between returned and with Done
Opening ceremony
[edit]- remove "the" before Chennai Super Kings Done
- told:
stated
Done - First Nigam sang, then all three, then Rahmnan? Bcs kind of confusing. Also maybe hit in hit song should be quoted? Done
- Was this it? Is it possible to extend? Done
- yeah, in the recent years BCCI has been focusing less on the opening ceremony as it doesn't really have a public reception like some years ago. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay about ceremony. Clarify the Nigam, Rahman part though. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, actually, you can expand it slightly by mentioning the time, and the match started after it, and maybe stuff like that, if there is any. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Also, actually, you can expand it slightly by mentioning the time, and the match started after it, and maybe stuff like that, if there is any. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
League stage
[edit]This is a big list, so I'm gonna changes by problem instead of listing individual cases.
- Are records for fours and sixes really necessary in a summary? Either by a player or in a match? Done{not all of 'em)
- Are records in a team really necessary most of the time? (as an example- Head's fastest fifty for SRH) Done
- Are records for a team really necessary? Does it matter that it was the lowest or highest-scoring powerplay and stuff? Done
- The last SRH qualified is not referenced. Done
- This is not necessary for a GA, but would make the article better- are there more details for those matches which just mention who won the match? Like I know every match doesn't make records, but is there really nothing to say regarding them?
- will look into it tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- have removed some less noteworthy ones; and most of the remaining one are usually listed in a cricket tournament page. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- some remain, I'll go over them later (maybe they will turn out to be imp enough). Also, I take it the matches with only the toss winner can't be expanded due to nothing imp happening? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- As of the earlier revision, it had pretty much everything that can be said about it. don't think there'll be anything else. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- mentioned two statements that I have problems with below this. Mentioning, to ensure they don't get lost due to the length of the review. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- also, just noticed, remove the ref in the lead. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- both done. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- also, just noticed, remove the ref in the lead. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- mentioned two statements that I have problems with below this. Mentioning, to ensure they don't get lost due to the length of the review. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- As of the earlier revision, it had pretty much everything that can be said about it. don't think there'll be anything else. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- some remain, I'll go over them later (maybe they will turn out to be imp enough). Also, I take it the matches with only the toss winner can't be expanded due to nothing imp happening? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- have removed some less noteworthy ones; and most of the remaining one are usually listed in a cricket tournament page. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- will look into it tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I have problem with two statements left
- and the first batsman to hit 100 sixes in 19th and 20th overs in IPL
- Travis Head equalled Abhishek Sharma for the fastest half-century by a Sunrisers Hyderabad player in the IPL, in terms of balls faced (16).
References
[edit]That's a lot of references, many of which are unreliable as a whole, but are fine enough for cricket though. I'll ask about ones which don't seem right(based on this version)
Ref-5: Mention ICC as publisher – not a site run by ICC- Oh yeah, noticed now. Is it reliable? Looks like a blog
- All other RS back then turned out to be factually wrong, and as the only source available this one was added after a consensus between involved editors. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay
- All other RS back then turned out to be factually wrong, and as the only source available this one was added after a consensus between involved editors. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, noticed now. Is it reliable? Looks like a blog
- Ref-17: is socialsamosa reliable? – and independent site, but seems like a reliable one Done
- Use publisher name, not websites where possible Done
- Ref-23 has a CS1 error – fixed Done
- Ref-32 has error – fixed Done
- Per WP:CONSISTENT, wikilink all or none of the publisher names Done
- Is LatestLY reliable? – not independent, but reliable Done(fine enough)
- Ref-171 is a tweet? – removed Done
- Ref 168, 169- Is OneCricket or Cricket.com reliable? – seems like, based on their site's about pages Done
Images
[edit]Just to make sure, that's the extent of free images available? (Like maybe Orange and Purple Cap holders and MVP?)
- done Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- the tables look bad, make them smaller/narrower again. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- I don't think so, they still look bad, on my browser atleast. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, just matches and look of tables remains. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @DoctorWhoFan91 Could you kindly post a screenshot of how it appears on your browser; so I can work on it. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- they are appearing fine when I change the browser size. I'll check to see what the issue is and tell you then? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed them, hope you are fine with it? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- All good and based on the fix, I guess the problem was the tables overlaying each other or something like that. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so, they still look bad, on my browser atleast. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done
Spot-check
[edit]- Will check every 8th of the pre-match references and every 20 of the match references
- Ref-1:
- Ref-9:
- Ref-17:
- Ref-25:
- Ref-33:
- Ref-41:
- Ref-49:
- Ref-57: new home base of Punjab franchise., officially inaugurated on Saturday.
- Ref-77: R Ashwin ... 200 matches in Indian Premier League
- Ref-97: first-ever century in the world’s richest T20 tournament.
- Ref-117: In 35 matches and 33 innings ... Dube has made 1,018 runs
- Ref-137: the explosive finisher unlocked the 1000-run landmark.
- Ref-157: 9000 runs in T20 cricket on Indian soil ... first player ... in any country.
- Ref-177: IPL 2024 Most Fours
Will do the rest later.
Overall
[edit]Will review the rest of the article later, Vestrian24Bio. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Review finished, will do spot-check and pass article when all issues are resolved. Good luck, Vestrian24Bio. 19:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Vestrian24Bio, just a reminder ping. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- will do it today. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 08:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @DoctorWhoFan91: All done now. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Vestrian24Bio, just a reminder ping. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Table layout fixed. Check the two match summary lines I have problem with. Will do spot-check and pass it after,Vestrian24Bio. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |