Jump to content

Talk:2024 Indian Premier League/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 11:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 09:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Expect initial remarks in 24-48 hours. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before I start reviewing, I see that you are only the 7th biggest contributor, with less than 10% authorship, and nothing on the article talk page about you nom-ing it, which isn't good. Remember for next time you are nom-ing something for GA.

Statistics and Awards

[edit]

Playoffs

[edit]
  • Add sources for the "qualified for the final for the nth time"? (I'll have to check though if the statement might not be WP:OR)  Done

Lead

[edit]
  • Add '.' between "League" and "The tournament"  Done
  • Mention that Chennai is starting and ending venue bcs they won last year
     Done

Background

[edit]
  • Clarify that 2008 was also the first edition  Done
  • Format- CE first sentence, weirdly worded, and explain how the "change in group order was done"- randomly, or by some rule?  Done
  • mention the playoff is a type of Page playoff system  Done
  • Schedule- Mention the election and the possibility of being held abroad, before the confirmation it'll be held at home  Done
  • Mention due to being last year's winners for Chennai again  Done
  • Expand marketing.  Done
  • Expand broadcasting  Done
    All done, except Marketing & Broadcasting - because, they have literally nothing else to be expanded with... Which is why instead of their own separate section, they are kept as sub-sections. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Broadcasting- mention that's it's second year of the deal of this many $, after viewership etc levels last year? And for Marketing- other brands must have advertised too, and even the sponsors would have put out advertisements? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Unfortunately, there aren't enough WP:RS covering those, I will add what I can find. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @DoctorWhoFan91 I have added, what I could find with sources. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Will check, bit busy. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teams

[edit]
  • Add comma between returned and with  Done

Opening ceremony

[edit]
  • remove "the" before Chennai Super Kings  Done
  • told: stated  Done
  • First Nigam sang, then all three, then Rahmnan? Bcs kind of confusing. Also maybe hit in hit song should be quoted?  Done
  • Was this it? Is it possible to extend?  Done
    yeah, in the recent years BCCI has been focusing less on the opening ceremony as it doesn't really have a public reception like some years ago. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay about ceremony. Clarify the Nigam, Rahman part though. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, actually, you can expand it slightly by mentioning the time, and the match started after it, and maybe stuff like that, if there is any. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done

League stage

[edit]

This is a big list, so I'm gonna changes by problem instead of listing individual cases.

  • Are records for fours and sixes really necessary in a summary? Either by a player or in a match?  Done{not all of 'em)
  • Are records in a team really necessary most of the time? (as an example- Head's fastest fifty for SRH)  Done
  • Are records for a team really necessary? Does it matter that it was the lowest or highest-scoring powerplay and stuff?  Done
  • The last SRH qualified is not referenced.  Done
  • This is not necessary for a GA, but would make the article better- are there more details for those matches which just mention who won the match? Like I know every match doesn't make records, but is there really nothing to say regarding them?
    will look into it tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    have removed some less noteworthy ones; and most of the remaining one are usually listed in a cricket tournament page. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    some remain, I'll go over them later (maybe they will turn out to be imp enough). Also, I take it the matches with only the toss winner can't be expanded due to nothing imp happening? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As of the earlier revision, it had pretty much everything that can be said about it. don't think there'll be anything else. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    mentioned two statements that I have problems with below this. Mentioning, to ensure they don't get lost due to the length of the review. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    also, just noticed, remove the ref in the lead. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    both done. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have problem with two statements left

  • and the first batsman to hit 100 sixes in 19th and 20th overs in IPL
  • Travis Head equalled Abhishek Sharma for the fastest half-century by a Sunrisers Hyderabad player in the IPL, in terms of balls faced (16).

References

[edit]

That's a lot of references, many of which are unreliable as a whole, but are fine enough for cricket though. I'll ask about ones which don't seem right(based on this version)

  • Ref-5: Mention ICC as publisher – not a site run by ICC
    • Oh yeah, noticed now. Is it reliable? Looks like a blog
      All other RS back then turned out to be factually wrong, and as the only source available this one was added after a consensus between involved editors. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Okay
  • Ref-17: is socialsamosa reliable? – and independent site, but seems like a reliable one  Done
  • Use publisher name, not websites where possible  Done
  • Ref-23 has a CS1 error – fixed  Done
  • Ref-32 has error – fixed  Done
  • Per WP:CONSISTENT, wikilink all or none of the publisher names  Done
  • Is LatestLY reliable? – not independent, but reliable  Done(fine enough)
  • Ref-171 is a tweet? – removed  Done
  • Ref 168, 169- Is OneCricket or Cricket.com reliable? – seems like, based on their site's about pages  Done

Images

[edit]

Just to make sure, that's the extent of free images available? (Like maybe Orange and Purple Cap holders and MVP?)

done Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the tables look bad, make them smaller/narrower again. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
I don't think so, they still look bad, on my browser atleast. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, just matches and look of tables remains. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DoctorWhoFan91 Could you kindly post a screenshot of how it appears on your browser; so I can work on it. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they are appearing fine when I change the browser size. I'll check to see what the issue is and tell you then? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed them, hope you are fine with it? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good and based on the fix, I guess the problem was the tables overlaying each other or something like that. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot-check

[edit]
  • Will check every 8th of the pre-match references and every 20 of the match references
  • Ref-1:
  • Ref-9:
  • Ref-17:
  • Ref-25:
  • Ref-33:
  • Ref-41:
  • Ref-49:
  • Ref-57: new home base of Punjab franchise., officially inaugurated on Saturday.
  • Ref-77: R Ashwin ... 200 matches in Indian Premier League
  • Ref-97: first-ever century in the world’s richest T20 tournament.
  • Ref-117: In 35 matches and 33 innings ... Dube has made 1,018 runs
  • Ref-137: the explosive finisher unlocked the 1000-run landmark.
  • Ref-157: 9000 runs in T20 cricket on Indian soil ... first player ... in any country.
  • Ref-177: IPL 2024 Most Fours

Will do the rest later.

Overall

[edit]

Will review the rest of the article later, Vestrian24Bio. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Table layout fixed. Check the two match summary lines I have problem with. Will do spot-check and pass it after,Vestrian24Bio. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:2024_Indian_Premier_League/GA1&oldid=1253179821"