Talk:2024 Homs offensive

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article 2024 Homs offensive, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Military history: Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RFPP?

Should the page be protected so only ECP users can edit it? David O. Johnson (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Government withdrawal

@KajMetz: In response to your question in the edit summary, I deleted that because its contradictory. Ecrusized (talk) 14:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ecrusized: I get that, but with the current flow of events contradition is good for the bigger picture. If proven true, that statement loses its worth and won't be part of the article anymore.(talk) 14:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like pro-government forces statements have zero credibility at the moment, and I'm getting Bagdad Bob vibes from them, since they've also denied withdrawing from Aleppo and Hama during the past week. But I don't mind waiting for confirmation. Ecrusized (talk) 14:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being reported in UK reliable sources now that they have indeed quit the city.[1][2] Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rebels already reached the city centre!

WP:NOTFORUM LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 22:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Caption! 2A02:8388:4C0:1680:3008:5114:6234:A794 (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw it😭😭 crazy how fast this progresses 2001:4641:4EB7:0:1C7:D670:86D0:92B3 (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dude this is crazyyy broo i be waking up and somehow the rebels gain like 48210757025 miles every time i wake up lol

anyways the map should be updated infact THE ENTIRE WIKI SHOULD BE UPDATED LOL

watch by the end of next week assad is going to be in either moscow or in majority alawait regions. Somekidthatlikehurricanesandcycdlones (talk) 22:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrations currently ongoing in the center of the city. Source: https://syria.liveuamap.com/en/2024/7-december-21-celebration-in-the-center-of-homs-in-the-clock 79.140.150.151 (talk) 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the map

Chop chop 2001:4641:4EB7:0:1C7:D670:86D0:92B3 (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we merge the Homs Offensive and Palmyra Offensive articles?

As both are located in Homs. Into: Homs Offensives? KajMetz (talk) 11:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]