Talk:2023 White House cocaine incident

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drug Policy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: District of Columbia / Presidents Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Removal of a section

I removed the July 4 section from the timeline, as it was completely unsourced, and it was tagged with a {{cn}} tag. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reactions/Republicans

I don't think this section needs to be much longer than "Conservatives/Republicans believe that the cocaine belonged to a member of the Biden family," and a couple sources. Arkadios 200 (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of sourced text

@Neutrality: You have deleted some of the locations the cocaine was said to have been found. This was sourced content, and is one of the reason some are questioning the outcome of the investigation. Please explain your removal of this important text. Also, with this edit you removed text, as well as two sources, which you described as "horse manure". Which of the two sources do you believe meets this criteria? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those sources is acceptable or appears to be reliable. There are ample real, reality-based sources available: AP, Reuters, Washington Post, NYTimes etc. Neutrality^talk 22:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutrality: Why is this source unacceptable? There is no mention of it at WP:RSP. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note than it’s the burden of a proponent of a challenged source to prove its reliability. In any case, there’s no evidence that either source has strong editorial standard/control, a reputation for quality, meaningful use by others. Neutrality^talk 00:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You called it "horse manure". Prove your claim.

Wikipedia's reputation has become abysmal. When it appoints people like you as admins, that's no surprise. Your conduct is entirely unbefitting of an administrator. 172.58.109.208 (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of Shore News Network, which likely means it's just another tiny website operation run by...who knows? so it was likely never even significant enough to come to RSN attention, and sure enough, check it out, it's just a guy with a website and some "reporters." why use a source like that, unless it says something dubious that you personally agree with, when an abundance of major reliable sources are available on this story? soibangla (talk) 18:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fingerprints

finger prints tell who it was. What happened to that ? 2601:CE:4001:160:F54A:21C3:3A2:9CC7 (talk) 22:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

USSS found no forensic evidence. No DNA, no prints. soibangla (talk) 23:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation

The article has an extensive list of sources from notable news outlets and shows no explicit signs of bias. Almost every sentence is cited by a source, which is a positive. Although this is true, I have noticed that a lot of the sources are news outlets that identify as blue or liberal; which could be a source of potential, unintended bias. Because the sources are almost completely derived from news sources, the credibility could also be compromised. Lastly, in the "reactions" section, there is only a section for "Republicans" and not Democrats, which I think leaves the reactions section one-sided. Overall, given the amount of edits and revisions to this article, I'd say it is sufficiently well-written. Evelyn4712 (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Evelyn4712: Thanks for your hard work. The cocaine seemed to have had quite the White House tour, first being found in the library, them moving from place to place. More details were found here, but the edit was deleted and I haven't had time to revert. Odd indeed that the Dems didn't have much to say. If you can find something please add it. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Orphan tag can be removed - now linked on 2023 in United States page HDixon91 (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bsoyka (t • c • g) 20:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rumours

There's a rumour making rounds in the social media that a staffer brought it for Kamala Harris. GhuffHoo (talk) 10:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]