Jump to content

Talk:2023 NCAA Division I women's basketball championship game/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hameltion (talk · contribs) 01:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


Hi PCN02WPS, I'll review this in the next couple days.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Comments

[edit]
General comments
Lede
  • MOS:BOLDAVOID is a pet peeve of mine, but I won't hold the present lede (The 2023 NCAA Division I women's basketball championship game was the final game of the 2023 NCAA Division I women's basketball tournament) against this nom; I know that's how many other sports match FAs/GAs do it. Still, I suggest considering rewriting the first sentence to avoid redundancy and get to the important info quickly, as tennis articles tend to do. An advantage of this is that when hovering over a link to this article, the preview would helpfully begin, "The LSU Tigers defeated the Iowa State Hawkeyes 102–86 ..." (e.g.)
    • Totally get what you mean - I'm a little hesitant to change this since this sort of intro is the only thing that's ever used for basketball articles like this (and football articles similarly). PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Include appropriate summary of Media coverage and Aftermath sections in lede
Participants
Game summary
Media coverage
Aftermath

@PCN02WPS: Hope that this is a reasonable number of asks in a GAN review, most of them small grammar things. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS: Just checking in that you've seen this and want to make revisions, in particular for the handful of missing refs and (slight) failed verifications. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion Hi, sorry for the delay. I am planning to address your comments, though I've been traveling a lot lately and haven't had much time. I will get to them in the next few days if that's alright with you. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS: Great – no rush, just wanted to make sure you'd seen. :) Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS: Good work so far, about four or five things left I'd appreciate your comment or action on but nearly there. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion Thank you so much for your patience - I believe I've finished up addressing the last of your comments so the page is ready for another look at your nearest convenience. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 17:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. The article's in a pretty good state now. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.