Talk:2022 Fenway Bowl/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 20:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- see bottom
- b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- All of the names in this article need to be wikilinked per MOS:UL
- Do you mean the names of the individual players? If so, then I disagree; I don't think the linked MOS page supports that (they'd all be redlinks and, while that's not necessarily a bad thing, I'm not convinced they'd all be notable enough to be turned blue). If there's any football-specific terms that need linking, let me know and I can do that (that falls under the "jergon/technical terms" clause of UL). PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Any names that are bluelinks should be linked. Cherrell410 (talk) 02:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Done, added three links. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Cherrell410: Sorry, forgot a ping. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Any names that are bluelinks should be linked. Cherrell410 (talk) 02:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you mean the names of the individual players? If so, then I disagree; I don't think the linked MOS page supports that (they'd all be redlinks and, while that's not necessarily a bad thing, I'm not convinced they'd all be notable enough to be turned blue). If there's any football-specific terms that need linking, let me know and I can do that (that falls under the "jergon/technical terms" clause of UL). PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- "deadlocked" should be wikilinked
- Changed this to another word that more clearly describes what happened. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- All of the names in this article need to be wikilinked per MOS:UL
- a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- 8.7%!!!
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- No media, but media are not required for GA status
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- per above
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Suggestions for improvements:
- Pass/fail:
- Lead: The inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured... --> As the inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured...
- Adjusted, but used different wording. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Background: unable to play their scheduled opponent, smu, was unable to find a replacement --> sentence should be split into 2
- I disagree; the second part of that sentence explains that SMU wasn't able to replace UVA after they had to drop out. I think it sounds totally natural as is, with only one sentence. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Teams#Cincinnati: set to join --> joined
- I know this seems pedantic, but Cincinnati won't join the Big 12 until next Saturday, July 1, 2023, so changing it to past tense now would technically be incorrect. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
(Criteria marked 
are unassessed)
- @Cherrell410: responses above, thank you for the review. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)