This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Robert Tillman was a graduate of Wichita State University (WSU) in 1978, receiving a B.A. with triple majors in psychology, sociology and minority studies. In 1981 he received a Master's of Arts Degree in sociology. Tillman was a 2012 Democratic candidate who sought election to the U.S. House to represent the 4th Congressional District of Kansas. He won the Democratic primary nomination on August 7, 2012 with 70.8% over Esau A. Freeman with 29.1 %, losing to Mike Pompeo on November 6, 2012, 68%-23%. http://www.kssos.org/elections/12elec/2012%20Primary%20Election%20Results.pdfhttp://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2012/by_state/KS_US_House_0807.html A "perennial candidate," he was a 2016 Democratic candidate who sought election to the U.S. House to represent the 4th Congressional District of Kansas. He was defeated by Daniel Giroux in the Democratic primary. After Pompeo was made the head of the [[Central Intelligence Agency, Tillman was a 2017 Democratic special election candidate seeking election to the 4th Congressional District of Kansas. Attorney and U.S. Army veteran James Thompson got the Democratic Party's nomination over Dennis McKinney in a caucus vote, 21-18. Tillman and two other candidates had been eliminated in the first round of the caucus vote. https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article132183819.html
Pompeo has ruled out a Senate run as of 31 March 2019
@1Matt20: As I stated on this user talk page conversation, Pompeo explicitly announced on 17 March 2019 that he hasn't ruled anything out yet. I did a very specific google search here, showing news from between 9 March and 30 March which displays no articles with a definite decision yet. See this article and also this. They are far more recent than this CNN article, which is from 21 February and often mistaken to be Pompeo's final decision when, in fact, it isn't. ––Redditaddict69(talk)(contribs)09:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)@Redditaddict69: Both of your more recent articles reference the fact that he is, specifically, ruling out running in 2020. The decision they reference, a "month prior," is all they are running on. I think you are quite wrong and confused about this yourself. Those articles deal with future ambitions. Not sure how to proceed, as I hate inaccurate information being on this page, but am not interested in a tit-for-tat reversion battle either. User:1Matt20User talk:1Matt20[reply]
@1Matt20: Yes, both articles say he ruled it out last month, however Pompeo also said on the 17th that "“I try to just avoid ruling things out when there’s others who are in control... The Lord will get me to the right place.″" This still leaves at least some speculation open that he will run. Nobody can say with absolute confidence that he isn't going to run. Though my next point here is solely an opinion, still, his political ambitions have also changed rapidly numerous times in the last 5 years. He's mulled a Senate run, accepted a position as Director of the CIA without any prior speculation, and went from Congressman to Secretary of State in just over a year. He said explicitly that he's ruled nothing out yet; that counts for something, especially given that it is the most recent thing he's said on the topic. ––Redditaddict69(talk)(contribs)16:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Redditaddict69: All I'm hearing is your own personal speculation being filtered through a contextualization of his words and career that runs completely counter to all available info from the man himself. Completely inappropriate. Wait until further dispelling of his last decision to make such a leap. He said he isn't running in 2020. Believe him until he clearly dispels it. User:1Matt20User talk:1Matt20
Bryan Pruitt, returned from the District of Columbia, to set up campaign headquarters in Manhattan, Kansas. A former RedState conference coordinator and blogger, he expressed many typical Republican views during an August 5, 2019 interview saying he intends to support President Donald Trump's re-election, though he also said the party needs to change how it addresses abortion issues and add diversity to win millenial voters. "I really believe deeply that the Republican Party is at a juncture and is really going to have an exciting time (picking) a candidate who’s different, who’s diverse, he said. Men "should not be lecturing women about their bodies." Republicans need to tell women that "...that they are in control." Pruitt has faced past criticism from other LGBTQ advocates, who said he made transphobic comments in a 2016 RedState blogpost. He had written that there is "...not an epidemic of trans people being denied access to public facilities." He stated that he is a defender of religious liberty and that businesses should not be forced by government to provide a particular service, with the exception of government services and public accommodations. "Sometimes the gay left, they were not gracious in victory, so there’s a lot of cultural changes where we need to have soft elbows with."(sic) https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article233553727.html
Kris Kobach drew attention due to his involvement with the 501(c)4, "We Build the Wall" (WBtW). It has given cause for concern, as the fundraising and campaign mailing lists it is accumulating are prohibited from coordinating with his Senate campaign, but the ability and appetite for effective oversight within the Trump administration are anticipated to likely be inadequate. https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article232855972.html On August 1, 2019, he circulated a campaign fundraiser using both the corporate name and email list of WBtW donors. Common Cause Vice President for policy and litigation Paul S. Ryan said, "At a minimum, this Kobach for Senate fundraising solicitation email appears to violate the 'paid for by' disclaimer requirement" for official campaign communications. Ryan specified the requirement that mandates disclosure of the financial sponsors who originate official political communications. Kobach's email might be legal if his campaign paid fair market value for use of WBtW's list. If that were the case, a "paid for by" disclaimer would be required but was not present in the solicitation. Ryan said, "If the Kobach committee did not pay fair market value for the cost of disseminating this email, then the Kobach committee has arguably committed the more serious campaign finance law violation of receiving a corporate contribution in the form of a coordinated expenditure." We Build The Wall is legally prohibited from financing federal political campaigns, in any fashion. Besides the concerns raised about Kolfage himself, a week prior to the mailer, right-wing anti-immigrant, WBtW board member and former congressman Tom Tancredo sat on the stage alongside Kobach, and endorsed him in a New Mexico rally promoting the Wall.https://www.thedailybeast.com/kris-kobach-uses-border-wall-group-to-fund-senate-bid-likely-illegallyhttps://www-1.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article233296552.html After Common Cause filed a formal complaint and request for an investigation into the apparent violations, The Kobach campaign said that it is a "radical leftist organization," that the complaint was without substance and, "This attack by Common Cause also includes a frivolous letter to the Department of Justice, asking the Department of Justice to launch a pointless investigation. This is also typical of Common Cause tactics and it is intended to cause distraction wherever conservative Republicans are leading in important political campaigns." https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article233442267.html
.svg)
