Talk:2020 State of the Union Address

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2020 State of the Union Address article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Politics: American / Political parties Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: District of Columbia / Presidents / Government / History Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

U.S. Congress Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pelosi tear-up of the POTUS personally presented hard-copy of SOTU address speech = an "event" or an invalid acknowledged "gesture"

reportedly, Pelosi took the torn up copy of the speech and as she walked out through the chamber, she waved the torn pages to family, friends and democrat base. Captured in a video, she was questioned about doing this. She indicated that she did it as "well it was a courteous thing to do". 174.158.56.141 (talk) 04:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the Pelosi response: "well it was a courteous thing to do" is all I've seen so far in the videos published on line... Is the article factual as published? where is the footage covering the following quote "...considering the alternatives. It was a such a dirty speech" ??? 174.158.62.157 (talk) 04:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- the Pelosi response: "well it was a courteous thing to do" is all I've seen so far on TV, as well. The wiki article may be misleading at best, or incorrect at worst, regarding this documented event / "gesture". 174.158.35.46 (talk) 05:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

44th white president

Should the lead mention that Trump is the 44th white president?47.137.181.252 (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a racially slanted vulnerability... just my POV... 174.158.74.115 (talk) 07:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That idea is comically unnecessary and does not improve the article. RopeTricks (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article about the United States, where everything is about race, so mentioning the race of the President is relevant [Just kidding, it's a stupid and unnecessary idea] --177.230.47.65 (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trump's third SOTU? Or just the second?

From State of the Union: Newly inaugurated presidents generally deliver an address to Congress in February of the first year of their term, but this speech is not officially considered to be a "State of the Union". —⁠184.207.145.12 (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, crap! Trump has been in office a little over three years, but that means he's begun his fourth year in office, and 4 - 1 = 3. So, never mind the above. —⁠184.207.145.12 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The bias of Wikipedia in is dumbfounding: Selective reporting of facts

Everybody has always known Wikipedia is Liberally-biased, but are the editors here really going to ignore the fact that Pelosi ripped the President's speech (and it's massive backlash) and that she started doing so before it was even delivered?
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3

How biased is this thing really is?
Cheers from Mexico.
--177.230.47.65 (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]