Jump to content

Talk:2019 UK Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2019 UK Championship has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2019 UK Championship is part of the 2019–20 snooker season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 13, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Picture

[edit]
The auditorium during the U.K. snooker championship 2019 at York Barbican

I have a picture of the auditorium during the tournament, if anyone think it might be useful to include in the article. I took it during the interval of the second semifinal between Stephen Maguire and Mark Allen when the score was 4-0. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I'll likely do a write up similar to last year's event soon, and I'll put it in. Do you go to lots of events? We are always in need of more images. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2019 UK Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 05:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taking this review for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 05:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • "was a professional snooker tournament that took place from 26 November to 8 December 2019." - please include the location and the venue where the tournament took place
  • "had won the previous two championships, defeating Shaun Murphy 10–5 in the 2017 final, and Mark Allen 10–6 in the 2018 final." - this is not mentioned in the prose. I think it should be and it should also be verified by a reliable source which explicitly states this information
  • "It was the first maximum break to be made at the UK Championship since 2016, and the third of Hawkins' career." - this needs to be included in the main prose since it is only mentioned in the lead

Overview

[edit]

Summary

[edit]

References

[edit]

Am going to put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 09:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be done MWright96. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lee Vilenski: Now promoting to GA class. I've made one edit to the article. MWright96 (talk) 18:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final frame score

[edit]

There's some confusion about the final frame of the final. We have 114(114)-8 for the final frame, although officially it seems to be 103(103)-8 (eg http://www.snooker.org/res/index.asp?event=857, excludes the last blue and pink for some unknown reason) and we have the 103 in Ding's list of centuries, rather than 114. Mildly confusing. Nigej (talk) 11:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This BBC report says "103 to win the match", but this video proves that he potted the blue and pink and finished up on 114. Maybe the last two pots were considered irrelevant because he'd already won the match and made a century (to add to his career centuries count), regardless of the final break. Which I think is downright wrong! I vote that we stick with 114, but sourcing it might be a problem. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]