This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
Hi, Impru. I only wanted to say that this source says that "Popular Unity" (United Left, IU) and "Equo" are included in "Podemos*" although the name of "Podemos*" is used for the coalition "Unidos Podemos". It's weird but some polls are starting to say Podemos meaning Unidos Podemos. 5.34.154.217 (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It says "Unidad Popular", not IU. In fact, if you look at the article the poll is attached with, it clearly mentions IU as a separate entity (and says that Podemos would obtain half of the votes from those who voted IU in 2015). That, and the fact that the party icon shown in the chart is that of Podemos (normally, when Metroscopia intends to show Unidos Podemos they use their glyph, not Podemos'). So no, they're clearly separate in the poll, and if they say Podemos they surely mean to say Podemos and not Unidos Podemos (Both Podemos and IU still exist as separate entities after all). Impru20 (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Asqueladd. Both Equo and Más Madrid are registered as political parties in the Interior Ministry (search it here). I don't know what are you arguing when you say that you apply "same criteria as in 2019 Madrid City Council election". It is not the same at all. Aside from the WP:CRYSTALBALL issue (the hypothetic candidacy you added there was very undefined and not even sure to run, whereas Más Madrid is very clearly defined and established as of currently), you also attempted to add there a non-political party organization as a coalition partner to a the actual political parties. This is not the case here. Impru20talk19:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
