Talk:2018 cryptocurrency crash

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Cryptocurrency bubble
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Cryptocurrency bubble

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 July 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This page was proposed for deletion by Ysangkok (talk · contribs) on 10 July 2020.

Merge?

Should we merge this to Cryptocurrency bubble? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 17:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merge. While both articles have significant content issues, combining them might make things better. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~I'm against a merge. There were smaller bubbles in 2011 and 2013. The 2017/2018 bubble and crash is notable. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 01:26, 13 October 2018 (UTC)~~ _{My old account – change of mind. Џ 06:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)}[reply]

I support a merger on the condition that the page itself become a primary section of the Cryptocurrency bubble article to reflect its noteworthiness. Jajhill (talk) 02:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Smallbones, Power~enwiki, and Jajhill: See Talk:Cryptocurrency bubble#Merger proposal. Џ 06:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We could merge this article into Cryptocurrency bubble and update it pretty easily, maybe add sections on the previous 2 or 3 80%+ drops, but I'll suggest that we put the newest one first as it is the most famous - few people had even heard of cryptocurrency before 2017. Any thoughts? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 14:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Smallbones: I added the last paragraph in the introductory section of the bubble article that summarized the 2018 crash. I did not realize that there were previous 80%+ declines in the cryptocurrency market, but if there is enough content from citations for each 80% drop, then I would be in favor of creating separate primary subsections for each. -- Jajhill (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline: I don't see anything wrong with the articles being separated as is. ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 15:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing wrong with separate pages: general; and specific. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I propose changing the word "crypto" to "cryptocurrency" to avoid confusion.

SopaXorzTaker (talk) 04:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 01:04, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]