Talk:2017 United States gubernatorial elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

United States: Governors Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Virginia Election - No Main Article

There is a link to a 'main article' for the Virginia election,but there is no such article, and the link redirects back to this page. I suggest either creating such an article (though it is a bit early- such an article will be created eventually), or taking out the circular link. Jkaganoff (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States gubernatorial elections, 2017. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140129231831/http://thejohnfredericksshow.com/political-insighter-can-whitbecks-snow-save-the-senate-for-norment to http://thejohnfredericksshow.com/political-insighter-can-whitbecks-snow-save-the-senate-for-norment

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated

All,

Updated the page, the infobox had the wrong states, pics, and inc. govs. Updated the NJ section to reflect the recent primaries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.246.254.12 (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox removal

I restored the deleted infobox, have been reverted, and now invite discussion. Jus da fax 04:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to fix that box, but Scott Walker has nothing to do with either Virginia or New Jersey, and neither of the two guys pictured are majority/minority in either of the two states. (Also, the box is made for one election, this article is about two... so I don't even know if you can fit both into it) 75.172.240.172 (talk) 04:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's true. Quite right. Your deletion is the best short term fix. Perhaps someone who knows political infoboxes can help. Jus da fax 04:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the history of edits and you'll see that this is the third time somebody pointed this out and once even explicitly asked for help (July 4). But every time it got reverted and nobody cared. It's frustrating... 75.172.240.172 (talk) 04:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the problem exists elsewhere, at United States gubernatorial elections, 2013 for starters. Jus da fax 04:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh shit... No, I'm not gonna earn dozens of vandalism-warnings or argue my evening away. Screw it. 75.172.240.172 (talk) 05:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is not my area of expertise, a noticeboard may be the answer. Jus da fax 05:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok after puzzling over this, it turns out the "'leader" parameter in the infobox indicates the chairman of the respective parties Governors associations. But it is extremely unclear what "leader" means and why the pictures of the leaders are up instead of the candidates, this should be fixed across the board. However, since it is not wrong, I propose putting back the infobox. We are back at the beginning. Jus da fax 06:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Walker and Dan Malloy?

If the elections are for Virginia and New Jersey, what do Scott Walker of Wisconsin and Dan Malloy of Connecticut have to do with it? And why isn't their connection to the election mentioned in the article? PlanetDeadwing (talk) 01:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact, on many gubernatorial election pages, there are pictures of candidates who seemingly have nothing to do with the election. I don't understand. This should be made clear to readers. PlanetDeadwing (talk) 01:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PlanetDeadwing: they chair the RGA and DGA, respectively. Mélencron (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And it took me five minutes to figure out, as a poor reader of this article. Those chairpeople are not even mentioned in the article, and arguably have nothing to do with the elections being held, and their home states in particular. There have been complaints above, But every time it got reverted and nobody cared. It's frustrating. I'll give it a bold attempt once more, but it ought to be solved at a wikiproject level. No such user (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mélencron, RaySwifty18: If you have a substantial content reason to restore those GA chairs, who did not participate in the election in any way, shape or form, are not mentioned in the article, and whose appearance in the infobox only confuses the users, please put them forward. As always, onus is on those who want to include the material. And I don't consider "this is in other gubernatorial election articles as well" a sufficiently good reason, per WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. As for the ludicruous suggestion that You're the first to ever complain on one of the talk pages about it, so far as I can tell, check this fucking page and the article's history:

The template that was dynamically pulled in featured the correct map (Virginia and New Nersey) but the people and their states were incorrect two incorrect (Wisconsin was one of them). [1] - User:Plexiglasshouse
but Scott Walker has nothing to do with either Virginia or New Jersey, and neither of the two guys pictured are majority/minority in either of the two states. - user:75.172.240.172
it is extremely unclear what "leader" means and why the pictures of the leaders are up instead of the candidates, this should be fixed across the board - User:Jusdafax
Look at the history of edits and you'll see that this is the third time somebody pointed this out and once even explicitly asked for help (July 4). But every time it got reverted and nobody cared. - user:75.172.240.172
what do Scott Walker of Wisconsin and Dan Malloy of Connecticut have to do with it? And why isn't their connection to the election mentioned in the article? - user:PlanetDeadwing
And myself, in multiple occasions.

It is extremely frustrating to edit an article in good faith, after well-explained complaints by myself and multiple other users, only to be met with unexplained reverting and filibustering. So explain: how do those two photos accompanied with links to unrelated states help the reader's understanding of the topic? No such user (talk) 14:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't be difficult to understand. They head the DGA and RGA. That's listed on their respective articles, and this has been used for every previous article on U.S. gubernatorial elections by year. I don't know, maybe it's only familiar to politicos, but it should be fairly obvious why they're listed. Mélencron (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is difficult to understand, and we don't target our articles only to "politicos". Obviously, the governors-elects will become members of appropriate GAs eventually, but as far as I can tell Walker and Malloy have nothing to do with the elections at hand, and even if they do their roles are not mentioned in the article at all. Just because there is a place in this infobox for some photos does not mandate that they be used, and they occupy the most prominent place in the article. Docs for {{Infobox election}} state that image1 is "Image of Nominee, head of Party list or Party Leader", and those people are none. No such user (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third Party/Independents

If a third party or Independent holds a governors mansion, they are included in the infobox with the Republicans and Democrats. This is not new. I ask that there are no more edits removing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaySwifty18 (talk • contribs) 08:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]