Talk:2016 in arthropod paleontology

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"soon-to-exist Foulden Maar article"??

@Giantflightlessbirds: Why is a "soon-to-exist Foulden Maar article" relevant to this WP article on 2016? ... Betweenfootandshoe (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about to create an article on the Foulden Maar site, and checking there were already incoming links so it wasn't an orphan. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 05:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about that, I just now realised that you meant a new-to-exist WP article. If I see the term 'article', I automatically think of a scientific paper. Hence I thought an in press article could only be relevant to 2019, not 2016! ... Betweenfootandshoe (talk) 06:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]