Talk:2016 Milan–San Remo/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well, for my fellow Wiki Cup competitor. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.
Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated. MPJ-US 01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
GA Toolbox
[edit]I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.
- Peer review tool
- No issues
- Copyright violations Tool
- Just indicating the quotes really, no problems
- Disambiguation links
- No issues
- External links
- No issues
Well Written
[edit]"caused for the" should be "caused the""totaling" typo - should be "totalling"- No sources for that list of favorites? that needs a source or two
"Meanwhile, first crashes" should be "Meanwhile, the first crashes""on the other hand was" needs a comma after "hand"
Sources/verifiable
[edit]- They're looking okay to me, formatted correctly etc.
Broad in coverage
[edit]- Yes
Neutral
[edit]- Yes
Stable
[edit]- Fairly short lifetime so far, but nothing is looking worrysome
Illustrated / Images
[edit]- Yep, good
- @Zwerg Nase: - That's my review, congratulations this is probably the least amount of comments I've ever had on a GA nomination. I am putting this on hold to allow for the corrections to be made. MPJ-US 03:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Zwerg Nase: - Since I know you're busy I figured I would address the grammatical issues - just need some sourcing around the favorites and you have a Good Article on your hands. MPJ-US 00:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @MPJ-DK: Thanks! The sources are actually all there, mainly #3 and #13. Should they be placed differently? I put number 3 behind the sentence with Cavendish, but it applies to the previous sentence as well. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
@Zwerg Nase: Excellent, i missed that. Well then we have a GA. Congratulations. MPJ-US 14:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :) I updated the class template on the talk page. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)